The police telling lies
A press release from Sussex Police:
Woman convicted of historic offences against children in Sussex
Seven children who were sexually abused in Sussex between 26 and 33 years ago have seen justice done after their abuser was jailed for 20 years on Thursday, September 8.
Sally Ann Dixon, 58, of Swanmore Avenue, Havant, Hants, was sentenced at Lewes Crown Court after being convicted of 30 indecent assaults against her victims.
Except, of course, that the perp is actually a man. Naturally Sussex Police doesn’t admit that until the 8th paragraph.
At the time of the offences, Dixon was John Stephen Dixon, who transitioned to female in 2004 – after the period during which the offences took place.
Not our crime.
Sussex Police is telling us we’re not allowed to point out that Dixon is a man.
It’s IRRELEVANT that the child molester who sexually assaulted at least seven children is a man??? That’s NOT RELEVANT? Women are supposed to just kick back and nod in agreement at a headline that says a woman committed those crimes?
Yes. According to them, yes.
No we’re going to express it TO YOU in reply to YOUR TWEET.
Between the two utterances, if one is a hate crime, it is what Sussex police said, not what Sybil said. Telling women they have no right to tell the truth, and no right to protection from physical and sexual violence from men, is itself an act of misogynistic oppression.
The identity of the officer who sent that tweet should be discovered, and he should be reprimanded.
Mr Eichmann hasn’t worn an SS uniform in at least 15 years. It’s a hate crime to mention that he DID.
“If you have gender critical views you wish to express[,] this can be done on other platforms or your own page, not targeted at an individual.” I’m pretty sure this was extemporaneous, but it makes no sense. What does any of the first part have to do with “targeted at an individual”? Is this “individual” the officer who made the report or the perpetrator of the crime? Are there “other platforms” that are similarly publicly visible and known to be read by the police department, or is the point (as seems more likely) that the police department wants you to express your gender critical views somewhere they don’t have to see them?
I assume every crime committed by a biological female who doesn’t think/feel/identify/”present”/etc. in the ways required to qualify as a “woman” according to the new definition will be reclassified as not having been committed by a woman. Otherwise it’s mixing apples and oranges. And of course all biological females who don’t meet the new definition have to be released from “women’s” prisons.
@John, Waldheimer’s Disease is a terrible affliction that deserves our sympathy and support.