Ah yes, protesting. That’s what that is.
Why would women want single-sex spaces? Why would we not want men like that in the toilet stall next to us?
Ah yes, protesting. That’s what that is.
Why would women want single-sex spaces? Why would we not want men like that in the toilet stall next to us?
Comments
9 responses to “Transexclusionary policy on single sex spaces”
Piss Christ?
Or
Piss? Christ!
Trans cult recruitment at it’s finest, sure to capture hearts and minds. What’s next, a literal shitshow with actual shit?
I mean, where do I sign up? :P
Disappointingly, I see in the article no mention of the protester being arrested for public urination. Real activists stick around and risk arrest for their cause, this is just a coward with a fetish.
Is this some sort of riff on “we just want to peeeee”? ‘Cause, um, doesn’t this demonstrate rather well that they’re perfectly capable of peeing without having access to female spaces?
As if it isn’t the case that there is literally no more male behaviour in nature, besides actually having sex, than pissing all over things. Someone on Ovarit pulled this quote:
‘“We want queer people to know that protests can be enjoyable, they can be theatrical, they can be exciting, and they can be full of rage,” the activist who spoke to VICE said.’
I’d be very much surprised to find too many women using ‘enjoyable’ and ‘exciting’ to describe pissing (or ‘piss play’) in public.
After a cursory examination, I regret to announce that the goyim are at it again.
It hardly has the impact of self-immolation.
You won’t thank me for this, but here’s a thread someone put together about the piss guy:
https://twitter.com/TalulaThe/status/1567707680348815362
Blurgh. You’re not kidding.