University College London press release:
14 July marks International Non-Binary People’s Day, aimed at raising awareness of the issues that non-binary people face around the world.
Hmm. Ackshually, 14 July is Bastille Day. Famous for it. You’ve heard of Bastille Day haven’t you? In connection with a little item called the French Revolution? Quite conspicuous in its day.
But that’s genderism for you, innit. Just take what isn’t yours and then bully the people you took it from.
Find out more about what you can do to learn about diverse gender identities and create a more inclusive environment on campus.
No. I’ve already learned a great deal about “diverse gender identities,” all of it horrifying, and if the environment on campus were any more “inclusive” there would be no women present at all.
Familiarise yourself with the UCL policies and commit to challenging unacceptable behaviour
The university has guidance around recognising and challenging transphobic behaviour which encompasses support for non-binary people. Ensure you’re familiar with spotting harmful behaviour and if you experience or witness discrimination or harassment, please use Report + Support. Remember that we can all play a role in creating a safer, more compassionate, and inclusive campus.
By reporting people who don’t believe in Magic Gender to the authorities for punishment.
Comments
10 responses to “Commit to challenging unacceptable behaviour”
I’m fond of Jesus and Mo’s take on “nonbinary”. “You’re either nonbinary or you’re not!”
With more than 76 “genders” there is the potential for 76 holidays for recognitions, and we can multiply that by 3 for “awreness” and also “remembrance” days. And key is that on any day originally set aside to honor, remember, or respect women it’s important to state that transwomen must be honored, remembered or respected.
I also get the feeling that there is no day set aside for binary people. I’m not actually sure what they are, and they could use some recognizing before it’s too late and they are all genocided.
I wonder if any of they/them will storm the Bastille.
It’s terribly unfair to a certain Parisian prison. Because La Bastille is most definitely of the feminine gender.
This is a very poorly written sentence.
Well-written sentences are antithetical to gender-woo.
Whoever wrote this shite is definitely not a connoisseur of good writing.
In fact, to be honest, I think good writing is probably inconsistent with commitment to gender ideology. It requires too much doublethink to allow good writing.
I’m mildly curious about what they imagine those “issues” are. Insufficient validation and rampant misgendering I guess.
Or could it be complete indifference?
That would fall under “Insufficient Validation”
Clear writing is the product of a clear thought process, and clear thinking sees through this bullshit.