To channel that anger
The Independent goes out of its way to rub our noses in the fact that women don’t even get to have our own day any more:
Don’t tell me what a woman is, based entirely on what she is not
Says a man pretending to be a woman. Hey bub don’t tell us we don’t get to say that men are not women. You’re not a woman, based entirely on the fact that you’re a man.
Jordan Gray is the guy who played the piano with his penis on tv.
His first move is to gloat:
Indy Voices has asked me what it means to be a woman in 2023. I’m honoured by that question.
Of course he is. He likes to make people call him a woman, so when a national newspaper does it, hopla, that’s a good day.
The Independent has listed me as one of the “50 Influential Women of 2023”. All the while I’m keeping a stiff upper lip, while my human rights are disputed by billionaires.
No he’s not. It’s not a human right to force people to agree that you’re a woman when you’re a man.
On any given day, I can post a picture of myself online (eating some Wotsits, perhaps?) and the comment section will be inundated with unsolicited definitions of what a woman is… based entirely on what she is NOT. “Women are not men!” “Women don’t have penises!” “Women won’t wheesht!” (which I believe to be some type of gateau?). “Women have babies!”
Oops. Stupid, isn’t he. Based entirely on what she is NOT, like for instance “women have babies!” Dude, check your copy.
So he explains to us what a woman actually is.
A woman endures. A woman takes a licking and keeps on kicking. In 2023, a woman is angry – and has the power to channel that anger with incredible effect. A good woman looks before she aims.
But she is not allowed to keep on kicking against trans ideology. She’s not allowed to be angry at piggy men like Jordan Gray. She’s not allowed to channel her anger at the complete bullshit talked by men like Jordan Gray. She’s not allowed to see Jordan Gray when she looks before she aims.
H/t latsot
“Don’t tell me what a woman is, based entirely on what she is not.” No problem! A woman is female. Idiot.
A woman is a Timex watch?
A Timex watch AND a candy bar. Or something.
Can’t even write original stuff. Uses old commercials to describe what we are…even though he has no idea what we are, because he is not one of us.
A woman fights back when her boundaries are violated. A woman is someone who can be feminist without including men. A woman does not have a penis, and never did. A woman is an adult human female.
Oxfam is at it too, of course. I was especially delighted to see that ‘queer and trans women’ received higher billing on the roster of women to be amplified than did disabled women.
Fortunately, Genevieve has been ready for this since exactly one second after Oxfam did the same thing last year:
https://twitter.com/WomenReadWomen/status/1633493154598121472
Oh, I should point out that Oxfam is frantically hiding replies to their tweet. A friend is monitoring it in realtime and the score was 14 hidden comments within a few minutes of the tweet going up.
That “entirely” is doing a lot of work here. Of course not being a man, not having a dick etc. isn’t a sufficient precondition for being a woman. It doesn’t follow that it’s not necessary.
Indeed. Among the things I can see right now that aren’t men: couch, chair, door, mirror, thermostat. None of which are women (though in some languages some of them are feminine).
(Hey, do I pass the test?)