Remember, men are lesbians too
That disgusting rapey UN Women poster is from last October, but I think I missed it then. (I did a quick search of posts, and was surprised to see how many hits “trans lesbians” got.) Let’s give it the hostile attention it deserves.
Remember, says the UN, men are lesbians too.
Remember, laydeez, you are required to fuck men no matter what. You don’t get to opt out by saying you’re a lesbian because haha men can just say they are lesbians too and then you have to welcome their lesbian dicks.
That’s what “inclusion” means: women don’t get to say no. Ever.
I’m probably too stupid and old-fashioned to understand this, but it seems to me that anyone has the right to refuse sex with anyone else, without having to give a reason. It applies to normal heterosexual people just as much as to homosexuals, trans, etc. If you don’t fancy someone you don’t fancy them: that’s all there is to it. (I won’t get into the question of religions that say that a wife must always submit to her husband’s wishes.)
Well, on that note, “Trans straight chicks R straight chicks, 2,” reet? Let’s push that message really really hard and see how far we get.
Indeed Athel, that was the bottom line understanding at FTB right up until 5 min after Ophelia jumped. Prior to that disagreement got you called a rapist. After that, as long as you were pushing the narrative that turning down a trans partner made you a bigot you were fine.
Mind you, there is a Saving Effort aspect to being one or the other sexual.
Always with the cartoons. Not surprising given how most men in womanface look.
I’m not sure if people here are familiar with “corporate Memphis“*. I suspect the name is only really familiar to people with an active interest in design but the style itself is completely familiar to anyone who’s ever been online (or indeed alive in the 21st century). In short it’s the go-to style used when a faceless corporation wants to appear gentle, human-centred, inclusive, or, dare I say it, “kind”. This is an absolutely unremarkable example of its use. The soft pastels and/or bright colours represent a world where everything is straightforward and “frictionless”, all the messy details abstracted away. It’s not surprising that it most closely resembles illustrations from children’s books (though with a dash of 50’s nostalgia mixed in). It’s deliberately designed to evoke a state of pseudo-childlike innocence, where even thinking about the hard questions would feel, well, just wrong. And it does that job well. I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader how this fits in with the drive to eliminate actual childhood “innocence” (meaning I have absolutely no clue but I wish I did).
I wasn’t. Interesting! Thank you Francis. I did notice the very particular style.
Interesting indeed. Thanks, Francis!
Meanwhile we’ve all noticed the fondness of the TQ+ crowd for cartoony (usually bad manga/anime) images of big-eyed child-women.