Policies
What could possibly go wrong?
Mental health hospitals responsible for violent criminals have policies which allow biologically male patients to “self identify” as women, an audit has revealed.
Campaigners warned that NHS trusts are “playing Russian roulette with women’s safety” by placing transgender women — who were born male — on female wards.
Why don’t NHS trusts know that without being told? How is it not blindingly obvious?
In some cases, hospitals acknowledged that some trans patients may pose a “risk to a particular gender” or be “sexually disinhibited” and “very distressing for other patients on a single-sex ward”.
Lying obfuscating sneaky toads. They mean male patients obviously pose a risk to women. How dare they lie about it and obfuscate it with burble about “a particular gender” and “other patients”?
The lying and obfuscation make it entirely clear that they know what the problem is and are carefully trying to hide it. It’s not that they don’t realize males are a danger to females, it’s that they’re lying about it. For what? For the glorious cause of letting violent men have access to helpless confined women.
One trust, South West London and St George’s, suggested that it may sometimes be appropriate to put forensic trans patients on a ward in line with their biological sex “while they are acutely unwell” due to being a possible “risk to a particular gender”. The policy document added: “Once they have recovered and have regained capacity it would be essential to reassess the risk … and if safe and appropriate, to arrange a move to a ward in accordance with their correct gender.”
Sometimes? It only “sometimes” “might be” “appropriate” to put male criminals in a male ward? It’s always absolutely imperative to put male criminals in a male ward.
As Helen Joyce put it:
“These NHS trusts are missing the point: no male patient should ever be allowed in female accommodation under any circumstances. If health care managers cannot understand why this matters so much in mental health services, then they are not fit to run NHS trusts or to have female patients in their care.”
The NHS says it’s thinking about it, sort of, maybe.
It isn’t their correct gender. It’s their pretend gender, and a mental health institution, of all places, should not be indulging delusions, they should be working to help the patients come to grips with reality.
I would say that the NHS has been lobbied, and those in it who make the decisions do not have to bear the consequences of them. That fact possibly, maybe, perhaps gives them a sort of inner pride in their own power, and in the exercise of it, and in the fact that others have to deal with what ensues..
Well, there’s your problem right there. The wards are single sex; that’s nothing whatever to do with “gender.” The genderists scream at everyone else that gender and sex are different, and that we evil TERFS are not keeping them separate, when that’s their whole playbook: say that gender is different from sex, claim a “gender” that is named by a sex, then hey presto, my gender is your sex, and I’m actually your sex. Bait and switch, equivocation fallacy, projection and gaslighting by doing what you accuse others of doing — call it what you like, it’s lying through and through.
But wards are not segregated or aggregated or classified or assigned by “gender.” At all. Ever. They are always and only classified by sex. “Gender” doesn’t enter into it. The men can do whatever gender they want on the men’s ward.
And how much can you say that mentally disordered men have “recovered,” if they persist in claiming to be a sex they are not? That kind of thinking is inherently dangerous to women. Men who have that delusion should never be let anywhere near women. They qualify as MDSOs, Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders. Because that’s their fantasy. That’s what they wish for. They want to exploit women either for their own sexual pleasure, or as an act of sexual domination over women. They all should have neon lights over their heads, flashing, “Danger! Danger, Will Robinson!”