Notice anything missing?
What’s missing: any hint of awareness that “inclusion” of men in all women’s spaces without exception is “inclusive” of men at the expense of women.
Emily Thornberry is a woman herself, I take it, yet she blithely drives a tank through women’s rights while babbling wildly about “inclusive services for all our residents”.
It can’t be done. If you include men in all women’s spaces without exception, then you’re not providing inclusive services for women.
You’re also not being inclusive of women in your worldview, your politics, your awareness, your thinking. On the contrary: you are systematically ignoring women and their needs. So odd, when you’re a woman yourself.
Leave a Reply