Guest post: Disability Rights UK opposes the law of the land

Our friend latsot posted a brief essay on twitx that deserves wider sharing. Here it is.

Disability Rights UK opposes the law of the land, specifically the Equality Act 2010.

It also opposes the disabled people it purports to represent.

It places a far, far greater priority on the wishes and feelings of men who say they are women than on the needs of disabled people.

In all its talk of healthcare and the lamenting of gender-addled people being placed on wards relating to their sex, it does not once mention the necessity of single-sex intimate care for disabled women.

It does not say that disabled women should be allowed to choose the sex of the person carrying out their intimate care, which most often takes place in the woman’s own home, far from supervision.

It sees this as a far lesser priority than men being allowed to invade female wards, where they are known to be a danger.

Could there possibly be more of an indication that Disability Rights UK has entirely lost its way and is no longer a disability rights charity at all?

The charity’s statement does say one thing that initially seems to support disabled people: “We are appalled at implications from the Code that an adequate workaround is trans people using Disabled toilets instead.”

I fully agree. However, it goes on to explain that its concern is not about disabled people who will lose our accessible facilities altogether if anyone and everyone is permitted to use them, but for the men who will be sad if they can’t invade women’s spaces.

Not “accessible spaces are under threat of colonisation by the able-bodied”, but “we will not be used as a ‘loophole’ in the wider erosion of trans rights.”

That is exactly the wrong way around.

Disabled people have known for a decade that the major disability charities are hopelessly captured. They’re pulling a Stonewall by going after easy money and cheap non-solutions to the problems disabled people face every day. They’re throwing us under the same bus Stonewall threw same-sex attracted people under.

We’ve known this and we’ve tried to fight it but we haven’t been heard.

The gender war against disabled people is about to intensify and we don’t have many allies.

Can I ask you to share this, to demand answers from the major disability charities if you can and to remember that gender ideology is not just a war on women, children and same-sex attracted people, it’s a war on disabled people too.

And we often feel as though we’re fighting it on our own.

Disability Rights UK statement.

Comments

5 responses to “Guest post: Disability Rights UK opposes the law of the land”

  1. Piglet Avatar

    You know the phrase “Everything Trump Touches Dies”? Trans does the same trick. Any organisation gets hamstrung by these very angry, very entitled men who insist that everybody has to actively participate in a blatant lie, and that participating in the lie must take priority over everything that the organisation was originally set up for.

  2. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    And all of lefty politics gets hamstrung the same way.

  3. Piglet Avatar

    One thing that’s interesting to me is that pro-choice organisations and individuals in the US seem to be rowing back a little bit on that weird dopey liberal taboo around the word “woman” in the context of the female body. If you look at coverage of the Delaney Hall protests, it’s “pregnant women” far more than “pregnant people”. And then there was this ACLU story from last year – just womaning it up all over the place. I’m curious as to what triggered the shift.

  4. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Interesting. I hope the shift spreads rapidly and completely.

  5. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Wow, thanks for the ACLU link – I can’t believe what I’m reading! Women women women –

    I do see one “pregnant individuals” but it’s vastly outnumbered. Ok time for ctrl f…14 women, 4 pregnant individuals. Should be 18 & 0, but still. Progress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *