Extraordinary that they don’t see it.
He will never be safe in a men’s toilet, he says, so his solution is for him to make women unsafe by using our toilets. And Channel 4 is too stupid or too ideological to point out this obvious flaw.
Special
Comments
2 responses to “Special”
-
Nobody in a men’s toilet is even going to meet your eyes, “Isabella.” This isn’t a complaint about a real hazard, it’s a projection of a sex fetish.
-
1. I think he’ll almost always be safe.
2. There is *some* risk, as men have been known to be violent toward other men. One factor in that violence is a tenet of toxic masculinity that punishes any male who is insufficiently masculine: geeks and gays have been targeted. A man who chooses “transgender woman” as an “identity” can conceivably run across men who would beat up “girly men.”
HOWEVER,
3. As a man, he has a much better chance of defending himself against another man than a woman would have of defending herself against a man.
4. The risks he runs are qualitatively different from those faced by women who are attacked by violent men.
5. The “trans rights” campaign has been very successful at normalizing their deviant behavior, so much so that armies of masked men who are *not* transgender show up at the drop of a hat to terrorize women who dare to speak about women’s rights. If you’re that afraid of violent men in the men’s room, send out your bat-signal to the hordes of Black Pampers ready to defend you. Take your own contingent of violent men into the bathroom with you. You’ll be safe enough with your bodyguards.
Leave a Reply