Which twin has the ideology?

Written by

Ophelia Benson

in

Wut?

I don’t get it. Why is one more “inclusive” than the other? Unless he’s pretending that ladies/gents refers to class and thus excludes everyone below the upper class, which of course is not what ladies/gents means (not least because real gents don’t call themselves gents).

Anyway. Public toilets are not meant to be inclooosive in every sense. They’re for everyone, so inclooosive that way, but they are separated/segregated by sex, because of the whole Territory Between the Legs aspect. Women should not be forced to accept Mr Richards in the cafe toilets.

Comments

3 responses to “Which twin has the ideology?”

  1. Peter N Avatar
    Peter N

    It seems to me that “hers” and “his” are easier to understand than “ladies” and “gents” for people with limited English. I wouldn’t have guessed that it had anything to do with other forms of inclooosion.

    But I could believe that “she/her” Steph Richards has only a hammer and thus everything looks like a nail.

  2. Sumi Avatar
    Sumi

    Maybe designating toilets by pronoun suggests that pronoun-havers may use them according to their pronouns.

  3. Ophelia Benson Avatar
    Ophelia Benson

    Could be, but then again the same applies to the words women and men. “It’s ‘she!!” is the same as “I AM a woman!!” in this context. It’s word games all the way down.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More posts