All entries by this author

Preacher

Jun 29th, 2005 2:50 am | By

What was that we were saying about Bible-clutchers who avow their belief that everyone ‘outside’ of JC will get conscious torment for eternity? And about the thought that people who choose to believe that, and sign a statement saying so at the beginning of their college careers, and carry on as usual in a cheerful tranquil manner – have something badly wrong with them; that such people are not, as is so often assumed of ‘devout’ believers, better than other people, but worse?

Well. Last January, some six months before Edgar Ray Killen was convicted and sentenced for the murder of James Chaney, Michael Schwerner, and Andrew Goodman, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote a piece in The New Yorker about a visit Read the rest



Islamic Group Cross at Transvestite Beauty Contest *

Jun 28th, 2005 | Filed by

Leader worries Allah might send second tsunami to punish.… Read the rest



Televangelist in Nigeria Furious at Tiny Payoff *

Jun 28th, 2005 | Filed by

Promised miracles, expected 6 million people, got 1 million, had hissy fit.… Read the rest



Ethics of Amputation by Choice *

Jun 28th, 2005 | Filed by

Two Australian philosophers exploring the phenomenon of amputee wannabes.… Read the rest



On Vivian Gornick and the Pursuit of the Ideal *

Jun 28th, 2005 | Filed by

‘Ideas, dolly, ideas. Without them, life is nothing. With them, life is everything.’… Read the rest



Pulling Down the Moonshine

Jun 28th, 2005 | By Geoffrey Dean

Astrology, Science and Culture: Pulling Down the Moon By Roy Willis and Patrick Curry. Berg, Oxford 2004. ISBN 1-85973-687-4. 170 pages including bibliography and index. GBP15.99 paperback.

The subtitle “Pulling Down the Moon” refers to the women diviners of ancient Thessaly who, Plutarch said, can pull down the moon. Roy Willis is a social anthropologist at the University of Edinburgh. Dr Patrick Curry is a social historian and Associate Lecturer at the Sophia Centre for the Study of Cultural Astronomy and Astrology, Bath Spa University College.

In order of increasing controversy, astrology has been seen as a topic of great historical importance, a useful fiction to promote therapy by conversation, a cloud in which meaningful faces can be seen, an … Read the rest



Disorder and Early Sorrow

Jun 27th, 2005 10:16 pm | By

This review of Simon Blackburn’s Truth brings up Munchausen’s by proxy:

For a more serious example of the misuse of “objective facts” by people in power, he blasts the proponents of “Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy,” which Blackburn calls “a description invented by a British pediatrician for a ‘condition’ in which mothers harm or kill their babies in order to gain attention for themselves. By insinuating the quite false idea that science had ‘discovered’ this ‘condition,’ and therefore in some sense was on the way to understanding it, and then by ceding power to ‘expert witnesses’ who could pronounce upon its presence, the medical profession assisted in the conviction of many innocent mothers whose babies had died of natural causes.”

The … Read the rest



Meadow’s Odds on Double Cot Death ‘Not Right’ *

Jun 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Mistake to assume each SIDS death is independent when calculating odds.… Read the rest



Zimbabwe’s Secret Famine *

Jun 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Aids, starvation, depopulation of cities sending tens of thousands to a silent death.… Read the rest



Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy by Proxy *

Jun 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Doctors who make up illnesses in order to draw attention to themselves.… Read the rest



Review of Simon Blackburn on Truth *

Jun 27th, 2005 | Filed by

‘Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy’ one example of misuse of ‘facts.’… Read the rest



Vote for Hume *

Jun 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Despite failure to die young or smoke Gauloises, he’s Topp.… Read the rest



Supreme Court Ruling on Ten Commandments *

Jun 27th, 2005 | Filed by

Barred in court, allowed in park at state Capitol.… Read the rest



The Griffin Can Be Umpire

Jun 27th, 2005 2:08 am | By

Hey remember last winter when I used to tell you all about Wicca and Celtic pathworkings and Sylvia Browne on angels? (I’m getting all tearily nostalgic just thinking about it. Those were the days – turning over page after page, staring at the words in disbelief, laughing incredulously, drawing moustaches on the angels and druids.) Well now other people are talking about her, to wit, PZ at Pharyngula and James Randi. It all sounds so familiar.

All God’s creatures exist on the Other Side with only one exception. The only living things I have never seen at Home are insects. I am not sure exactly why that is, but I have never seen a spider, fly, or any

Read the rest


Page Missing

Jun 26th, 2005 11:26 pm | By

Elliott sent me a link to another review of Michael Ruse’s new book. It’s no more convincing than any of the other articles, interviews, or reviews have been. No doubt the book is much much more so – or at least no doubt it makes clear what he means – but I wonder why all the secondary accounts are so unconvincing.

This one just feels as if something vital has been left out.

The crux of Ruse’s argument, however, is that this “religiosity” of zealous Darwinians is not just apparent, but real. Evolutionism (which I define more closely below) is a religion: a secular and godless religion, but a religion nevertheless…Evolutionism includes associated ideas of materialism and naturalism. Like

Read the rest


The US as a Pool of Cheap Labour *

Jun 26th, 2005 | Filed by

Millions of low-wage workers who have all but lost the right to organise.… Read the rest



Ethics of Amputating Healthy Limbs *

Jun 26th, 2005 | Filed by

Two Australian philosophers say okay, surgeons say not okay.… Read the rest



Sunil Khilnani Reviews Amartya Sen *

Jun 26th, 2005 | Filed by

Sen asserts his belief in what he calls the ‘sovereignty of reason.’… Read the rest



Return to Patrick Henry

Jun 25th, 2005 10:35 pm | By

I googled Billy Graham, out of curiosity, to see how keen on hellfire he is. It seems to me I read an article recently that said he was more of a fan than I had (vaguely) thought – but I’m not at all sure. This site certainly doesn’t think so – it thinks Billy is a dang backslidin’ heretic, and it’s pretty pissed about it.

Scripture is not unclear about the fact that Hell is a place of fiery torment (Isaiah 66:24; Mark 9:43-48; Matthew 3:12; 5:22; 13:40-42, 49-50; 18:8-9; 25:41; Luke 16: 19-31; John 15:6; Revelation 14:10; 19:20; 20:10, 14-15; 21:8). Yet, Mr. Graham denies this truth. In an interview with Time Magazine (November 15, 1993), Mr. Graham said

Read the rest


Sartre’s Paradox of Freedom *

Jun 25th, 2005 | Filed by

We’re not free to be not free.… Read the rest