All entries by this author

Nawal El-Saadawi in Al-Ahram *

Jan 30th, 2004 | Filed by

‘Why should the head of women in particular be considered so dangerous that it must be made to disappear?’… Read the rest



A Past Master at Having It Both Ways *

Jan 30th, 2004 | Filed by

‘trying to create a kind of moral-political Theory of Everything, he gets badly out of his depth’… Read the rest



Hazlitt Speaks His Mind

Jan 29th, 2004 6:55 pm | By

Something put me in mind of Hazlitt’s famous Letter to William Gifford this morning – so I thought I might as well give you a bit of the flavour of it. It’s a permanent, settled grievance of mine that Hazlitt is so little-known. I think he’s the single most inexplicably obscure writer in English. He ought to be at least as famous as Orwell and far more so than Lamb or Carlyle. He’s an absolutely brilliant, dazzling writer, and he’s no slouch as a thinker, either.

The letter to Gifford starts off briskly:

Sir, You have an ugly trick of saying what is not true of any one you do not like; and it will be the object of this

Read the rest


Time & Newsweek Have a Responsibility *

Jan 29th, 2004 | Filed by

To people in bookless small towns who want to learn about ideas.… Read the rest



Carl Zimmer on Creationist Rhetorical Tricks *

Jan 29th, 2004 | Filed by

Pretend science is like politics and there is always a middle ground.… Read the rest



Media Storms Can Mislead *

Jan 29th, 2004 | Filed by

Undue attention to cloning distorts public understanding of the field.… Read the rest



Corruption? Yawn

Jan 28th, 2004 7:58 pm | By

Corruption in US politics is a hardy perennial issue. Reliable, sturdy, always there; something to count on in a disconcerting world. This is, of course, because nothing is ever done about it, and the people who ought to care about it mostly don’t, and the people who ought to pay a penalty for engaging in it don’t, and the people who ought to be paying attention mostly aren’t, and the people who ought to be bringing it to the attention of the people who ought to be paying attention and ought to care mostly aren’t. It’s all a bit discouraging, frankly. Or to put it another way, it’s completely disgusting and infuriating, and an outrage, and absurd, and blindingly obviously … Read the rest



The Uses of Nanotechnology *

Jan 28th, 2004 | Filed by

High-profile opponents take an unbalanced approach, say ethicists.… Read the rest



Misconceptions Could Harm the Poor *

Jan 28th, 2004 | Filed by

Bioethics Centre and Peter Singer against Prince Charles on nanotechnology.… Read the rest



After After After Theory *

Jan 28th, 2004 | Filed by

Yet another postmortem.… Read the rest



Why Don’t People See? *

Jan 28th, 2004 | Filed by

Paul Berman lists six causes of partial vision.… Read the rest



Desperation

Jan 27th, 2004 9:44 pm | By

This is funny. Hilarious, in fact. A blogger and frequent blog-commenter who is well-known for an unattractive combination of heavy sarcasm and rudeness made safe by anonymity, tries another bit of heavy sarcasm that falls rather flat, and contradicts himself in the process. Compare three statements:

“High-Caste Hindu”: Irreverently Humorous or Casually Colonialist and Racist? Chun Informs, You Decide

Do you assume that Spivak calling herself this would make it any less casually colonialist or racist (if in fact that’s the proper description–about which I, as I wrote, have no opinion)?

I find your points to be cogent, but I believe you must detect a patronizing note in Inglis’s description.

Ah. You decide. I have no opinion. But on the … Read the rest



Do I What?!

Jan 27th, 2004 8:52 pm | By

This article starts off with a pretty bizarre story.

The other day, I was reading an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean in Newsweek when I had to stop and check that it was indeed Newsweek and not, say, Christianity Today. Yes, it was indeed Newsweek. And, after a series of questions about a variety of public policy issues, Dean was asked, out of the clear blue, the following question: “Do you see Jesus Christ as the son of God and believe in him as the route to salvation and eternal life?”

Really? Really?? I never read Newsweek, so I don’t know, but that is such a weird question that it strains credulity. I mean, was … Read the rest



What is History For? *

Jan 27th, 2004 | Filed by

Should students be learning vocational skills at the expense of substantive history?… Read the rest



A Religious Test for Public Office? *

Jan 27th, 2004 | Filed by

Why did Newsweek ask Dean if he sees JC as the son of the deity?… Read the rest



Conflict Between Solidarity and Diversity *

Jan 26th, 2004 | Filed by

Progressives want both but they’re not entirely compatible.… Read the rest



Bubble-Bath for the Soul *

Jan 26th, 2004 | Filed by

Seven Habits, Fifth Discipline, Timeless Mind, Chicken Soup – is there no end to the bilge?… Read the rest



Dude, Where’s My Site of Hegemonic Dominance?

Jan 26th, 2004 2:04 am | By

John Holbo has a very sly post on the tireless Bad Writing subject on his blog. He read the first three issues of the PMLA – Proceedings of the Modern Language Association – for 2003 cover to cover, twice. (Then he had a complete blood transfusion and is well on the way to recovery – now cut that out.) And he has some thoughts.

First he quotes Judith Butler explaining why bad writing is necessary and good:

The accused then responds that “if what he says could be said in terms of ordinary language he would probably have done so in the first place.” Understanding what the critical intellectual has to say, Marcuse goes on, “presupposes the collapse and invalidation

Read the rest


Reading For Something

Jan 25th, 2004 5:06 pm | By

One thing (but not the only thing) that prompted this train of thought (or perhaps bus of rumination or minivan of woolgathering or rollerskate of idle daydreaming) was something I read a few days ago in another of Dwight Macdonald’s letters, this one from January 1946, when Macdonald was editing his own magazine Politics.

I suppose you’ve read by now Simone Weil’s article on The Iliad. The response to it has surprised me; I thought it was a great political article, dealing with the moral questions implicit in the terrible events one reads about in every day’s newspaper, which was why I played it up so prominently in the issue…Nothing I’ve printed yet seems to have made so

Read the rest


Flawed Theory Leads to False Convictions *

Jan 25th, 2004 | Filed by

Ministers were warned about Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy in 1996.… Read the rest