Guest post: The asteroid doesn’t care

Jan 22nd, 2026 12:10 pm | By

Originally a comment by Bjarte Foshaug on Ownership.

I’m getting increasingly annoyed when people make a point of how America already has military bases on Greenland and are free to pretty much do what they want. So if they didn’t have have the Danish government’s permission to act as if they owned the place, that would indeed be a legitimate reason to invade? There’s a reason why negotiating with terrorists is considered such a terrible idea. If it were up to me, the American forces on Greenland would be given 24 hours to get the hell out the moment Trump put forth his threat (at the very latest).

As embarrassing as it must be (or at least should!) to be American these days, it’s hardly any better to be European. It’s been sickening to watch our leaders compete to abase themselves before the orange bully and sacrifice every shred of integrity, dignity and honor in exchange for less than nothing. If cringiness had mass, the world would have collapsed into a black hole long ago. Not only are they failing to protect Europe, but they’re turning it into something not even worth protecting. I don’t know whether the European spine died with Churchill and De Gaulle or simply atrophied out of existence through decades of disuse, but anyway it’s gone.

Think of Trump’s America as asteroid on a direct collision course with the Earth. You wouldn’t waste your time trying to talk the asteroid into changing its trajectory or argue about what we need the asteroid to do? It doesn’t care. You simply do whatever you have to do to push it out of the way. There is no harm the asteroid is going to do if you fail to appease it that it’s not going to do anyway. Same with Trump. He is going to do as much harm and evil as you allow him to do, and that’s it. There is no possible consequence of fighting back with everything you’ve got that’s worse than failure to do so.



Third warning. Gas, gas, gas.

Jan 22nd, 2026 11:32 am | By
Third warning. Gas, gas, gas.

The Battle of Minneapolis continues.

Federal agents deployed smoke and chemicals on Jan. 21 as they clashed with protesters and observers at two spots in south Minneapolis.

U.S. Customs and Border Patrol Cmdr. Greg Bovino lobbed a smoke canister at Mueller Park in the Whittier neighborhood. “I’m gonna gas. Get back. Gas is coming. Gas is coming, second warning. Second warning,” Bovino can be heard saying in a video captured by Ben Luhmann. “Gas on film! Gas on film!” Luhmann shouts in response.

“Third warning. Gas, gas, gas,” Bovino says, before tossing the canister and pushing people away from the street. Plumes of green and gray smoke burst over the crowd as protesters and observers run from the scene. Some were hit in the face with orange spray. The smoke left behind green stains in the snow.

Just a short while earlier and about a mile away, near West 28th Street and Blaisdell Avenue, agents held a person to the ground as they sprayed a bright orange chemical irritant directly into their face.

I suppose this is what Trump wants. There could be a slower, calmer, less sadistic process by which people who have overstayed their visas (or never had a visa, and so on) are given notice to leave, but that wouldn’t provide MAGA with the thrills it craves.

Just a short while earlier and about a mile away, near West 28th Street and Blaisdell Avenue, agents held a person to the ground as they sprayed a bright orange chemical irritant directly into their face.

The violent encounters between federal agents and local residents set off just before 2 p.m. Wednesday after the detainment of two people near Blaisdell Avenue and West 28th Street drew dozens of protesters who began to yell at the officers.

The encounters came soon after the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily stayed a lower court’s order that had sought to prevent immigration agents from detaining and pepper-spraying protesters and observers.

This sounds kind of familiar. I wonder what it’s reminding me of…



Irrevocably

Jan 22nd, 2026 10:49 am | By

Broken beyond repair.

Trump’s posturing over Greenland has irrevocably changed the transatlantic relationship, even after he backed away Wednesday from his threats of a US takeover of the Danish autonomous territory, European officials told CNN.

One European diplomat, speaking anonymously, described the last week as a “whirlwind of absurdity that damages transatlantic relations, distracts from Ukraine, and makes China and Russia very happy.”

Trump ruled out using military force to annex Greenland in his keynote speech at Davos on Wednesday, and he went on to drop his threatened tariffs and announce “the framework of a future deal” over the island after a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

But the diplomatic chaos he unleashed over the last two weeks still lingers, with profound ramifications for the US-European economic and diplomatic relationship. A key group of European Parliament members blocked a vote to ratify a US-European trade deal Wednesday, underscoring the tensions between the transatlantic allies.

Of course it lingers. Trump has made it all too clear how reckless and clueless he is, and the fact that he retreats just a little when the adults push back does not mean he has become not reckless and clueless. He will never become that.

Trump ruled out using military force to annex Greenland in his keynote speech at Davos on Wednesday, and he went on to drop his threatened tariffs and announce “the framework of a future deal” over the island after a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

But the diplomatic chaos he unleashed over the last two weeks still lingers, with profound ramifications for the US-European economic and diplomatic relationship. A key group of European Parliament members blocked a vote to ratify a US-European trade deal Wednesday, underscoring the tensions between the transatlantic allies.

When you have a deranged ignorant lunatic to deal with you don’t relax.

Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre emphasized that “NATO countries are cooperating day-by-day very closely.”

“Europe has its challenges. The United States has its challenges,” he told CNN. “But they’re all strong democracies, and they are allies in NATO. … We have great security to look after us and a very proud history of collaborating on that.”

Not really. The United States is not currently a strong democracy. It’s far too vulnerable to the deranged monstrous presider to be strong.



Far beyond

Jan 22nd, 2026 10:30 am | By

Ah yes the old “It was another guy, you don’t know him, he doesn’t go to this school” alibi.

The judge in the Sandie Peggie Employment Tribunal case has laid blame on a “judicial colleague” for the numerous errors in his ruling.

Cool cool.

Wait a second.

What?

Aren’t judges kind of expected to do their own homework? If they consult colleagues isn’t it still their responsibility to get it right? Kind of like the military, where the top brass is not supposed to blame the troops for failure?

Judge Sandy Kemp insisted that he did not us AI to help him write his 312-page judgment in the case, which has now been corrected a number of times.

His claim followed a formal complaint of judicial misconduct made by retired lawyer and former part-time tribunal chair Ewan Kennedy, who said that the corrections went far beyond those permitted under section 67 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, which provides for the correction of clerical mistakes.

He said it was “a very serious matter” for corrections to stray into “substantial matters”, among them substituting a word with its opposite.

Why yes, that would be a very serious matter.

Mr Kennedy said: “Suggestions have been made in the press that the falsehoods may have resulted from careless use of some form of artificial intelligence, but that can be no possible excuse. Any solicitor who did something similar in professional practice could expect immediate disqualification for life.”

But but but it was the kid next door who did it, honest.



Ownership

Jan 22nd, 2026 9:17 am | By

Your basic local extortionist speaks to the world:

Trump said Wednesday that he had reached the framework of a deal with NATO over Greenland’s future, hours after alliance officials separately discussed the possibility of the United States obtaining sovereignty over land for military bases, according to three senior officials familiar with the talks.

Mr. Trump’s announcement was among a series of moves on Wednesday that appeared to draw the United States back from the possibility of military and economic conflict with his allies over Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark.

Mr. Trump also withdrew the threat of additional tariffs for European allies that had resisted his insistence on owning Greenland, and said he would not use force to assert American ownership.

“I’m not gonna rough you up, you just gotta play nice with me, that’s all.”

Asked for details of the framework that Mr. Trump announced, NATO said in a statement that “negotiations between Denmark, Greenland and the United States will go forward aimed at ensuring that Russia and China never gain a foothold — economically or militarily — in Greenland.”

Mr. Rutte did not release details of the possible framework. Allison Hart, a spokeswoman for Mr. Rutte, said that he “did not propose any compromise to sovereignty during his meeting with the president in Davos.”

In other words he told Trump to fuck off, but politely. Trump doesn’t understand politely. He doesn’t know how to use it himself, and he doesn’t know how to react to it from others. He has a very crude and basic way with language.

Aaja Chemnitz, a Greenlandic member of the Danish parliament, rejected what Mr. Trump said about his potential deal with NATO.

“What we are witnessing these days in statements from Trump is completely absurd. NATO has absolutely no mandate to negotiate anything whatsoever without us in Greenland,” she said in a post on social media.

News of the possible framework came hours after Mr. Trump told European leaders in Davos, Switzerland, that he would not settle for anything less than the United States taking ownership of Greenland. Mr. Trump had promised dire economic and security consequences for Europe if he did not get his way.

Addressing a room full of heads of state, billionaires and other world leaders, Mr. Trump said repeatedly that the United States needed Greenland for national security purposes. He said that only the United States was strong enough to defend Greenland from external threats, and that defending it made sense only if the United States owned it.

He called for “immediate negotiations” to discuss transferring ownership of the semiautonomous island to the United States from Denmark and derided European countries as dependent on the United States. “Without us, most of the countries don’t even work,” Mr. Trump said.

Charm offensive 101.

Rasmus Jarlov, chairman of the defense committee in Denmark’s Parliament, said in an interview that “we’ve heard a lot worse” from Mr. Trump. “I’m glad he’s ruling out military force,” Mr. Jarlov said. “I didn’t see in his remarks today an escalation. He insists he wants Greenland, but that’s not new. Of course, we still insist that we are not handing over Greenland.”

Mr. Trump left little room for compromise in his speech, however. Many European leaders have maintained that they cannot countenance ceding ownership of Greenland to the United States, but they also say they would be open to almost any other arrangement that expands America’s presence there. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump said, again, that would not suffice. “You need the ownership to defend it,” Mr. Trump said. A moment later, he added: “Who the hell wants to defend a license agreement or a lease?”

Never rent; always own.



Despite being invited

Jan 22nd, 2026 4:32 am | By

Dictator blocks speech.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has said he was blocked from speaking at a World Economic Forum event in Davos and blamed the Trump administration.

Newsom’s office said on X that USA House, the official US pavilion at the global event, denied his entry to speak there on Wednesday despite being invited as part of an event by media partner Fortune.

The Democratic governor, whose state has the fourth largest global economy, wrote on X: “California was just denied at the USA House. Last we checked, California is part of USA.”

I didn’t know that about the fourth largest. Google says it’s true: right up there with Germany and Japan.

But wait, it gets worse.

The White House criticised the governor for attending the summit of global leaders and said that he should instead focus on his state.

“No one in Davos knows who third-rate governor Newscum is or why he is frolicking around Switzerland instead of fixing the many problems he created in California,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement to the BBC.

Oh for godsake. Press secretaries shouldn’t adopt Trump’s vulgar nicknames for people he doesn’t like.



All of these varieties of men are men

Jan 21st, 2026 5:13 pm | By

Naomi Cunningham on “the dolls”:

So in plainer words, “dolls” refers to men who say they are women. And “protect the dolls” means “protect men who say they are women from being faced with the reality that they are men, and the consequences of that reality”.

Ok, that’s clarifying. I’m not going to protect those men. They don’t protect us so why should we protect them?

“Trans women” are a subcategory of men. They are men who for whatever reason (and we are not privy to their individual reasons) either wish actually to be mistaken for women, or would like other people at least to pretend to mistake them for women. They go to a variety of different lengths to be seen as women. Some do everything in their power to “pass” as women, including radical remodelling of their genitals, voice surgery, facial feminisation surgery, laser hair removal, and modifying their gait and social behaviour. I’ve heard tell that the anguished desperation of some of these men to be seen as women has even led some of them to go so far as trying to modify their habit of interrupting and talking over women.

HAhahahaha. Very few of them though. Without interrupting and talking over women life just becomes so drab and pointless.

All of these varieties of men are men. And as I have already noted, we are not privy to their reasons for claiming to be women or performing their conception of womanhood. No doubt some proportion of these men feel a genuine distress that they were not born female, and are managing that distress by pretending as hard as they can that the reality they find unpalatable is not real. I couldn’t think that a healthy or a grown-up way of coping with the disappointments of reality even if it didn’t entail entitled demands to have everyone else join in with the pretence. But the demand is both delusional and oppressive.

YES. That’s what I wish more people would say more often and more loudly. That demand is a god damn outrage, yet so many people pretend it isn’t. Adults don’t play pretend games in public, let alone forcing other adults to play along.

At least, they don’t unless they’re as arrested in their development as the male characters in The Big Bang Theory. Adults who go to comic book conventions probably are fatuous enough to pretend to be the other sex, but that’s not an argument for pretending, it’s a reason for not being an adult obsessed with comic books.

But there are other kinds of men who say they are women. There are men for whom dressing as women is a sexual fetish. There are men who are sexually aroused by invading supposedly women-only spaces. There are cross-dressing men who talk to each other on Reddit chats and other places about their “euphoria boners”. There are men who go into women’s toilets and changing rooms in order to masturbate, film themselves while they do so, and then post that footage online. It’s a porn category.

There are even men who take drugs to induce lactation, and either express the resulting milk or get infants to suck on their nipples. That’s a porn category too.

But it’s bundled into the oppressed minority category, so we’re evil if we say those infants should be rescued before another sun sets.

…there’s exactly one acceptable way for men to behave in relation to women-only spaces, and that is to stay out of them. That’s what decent men do. If a man doesn’t stay out, he’s not a decent man. Even if he’s genuinely distressed by his male body and invading women’s spaces with no more nefarious intent than to comfort himself for that distress by playing pretend, he’s showing a callous indifference to women’s privacy and boundaries by doing so. He’s behaving like a man who doesn’t think women have the right to privacy away from the male gaze. He’s behaving like a man who’s not good with the word “no”.

There are so many of those around. The struggle continues.



His written remarks

Jan 21st, 2026 4:42 pm | By

They’re trying to tell us he didn’t say it. Child we heard him.

“His written remarks” she said, as if we were born yesterday. His written remarks were written by people who are not quite as bad at writing (and talking) as he is. His blurted remarks said Iceland. What you wrote down for him to say is not the same thing as what he did say.

Lying for Trump isn’t going to look good on your resume forever.



Ruined WHOSE life?

Jan 21st, 2026 4:09 pm | By

Scottish Daily Express:

Ross Greer questioned the “reliability” of Sandie Peggie as he complained that the employment tribunal involving her had “ruined” the life of Dr Beth Upton. The Scottish Greens co-leader also doubled down on his refusal to call trans double rapist Isla Bryson a man, hitting out at [rebuking] this line of questioning by the BBC.

So the Scottish Greens co-leader thinks Sandie Peggie is the one who messed up someone’s life, and that it wasn’t at all “Beth” Upton who messed up Sandie Peggie’s life. Women must always comply when men tell them to, even (or especially) when the men in question are pretending to be women and forcing themselves on women in the rooms where they change their clothes. Men who say they are women are both heroic and fragile, while women who say men are not women are wicked and terrifyingly strong and violent.

Sometimes it seems as if men don’t even try to understand.

Greer went on:

“And I don’t think it has been good for anybody involved in that situation. But I do keep coming back to the fact that Beth Upton, the doctor here, was dragged through this whole process. Horrible accusations were made of her. Her private life was invaded constantly. Her face was plastered all over the place. And in the end, the conclusion was, she had absolutely no case to answer.

“She had done nothing wrong. She was a doctor who was just trying to care for her patients. And for no other reason than being trans, her life has basically been ruined by this situation. So, let’s imagine that for no other reason than being Jewish someone had been dragged through that same situation. I think we would all acknowledge how outrageously utterly unacceptable that was.”

Lying or stupid or both?

Yes he had done something wrong, no he was not just trying to care for his patients. He was also using a women’s changing room despite being a man, and he did everything he could to wreck Sandie Peggie’s career as a nurse after she objected to his presence in the women’s changing room. That is in fact something wrong.

The comparison to being Jewish is wildly offensive.

I think men like this should have to wear a label, so that women know to stay well away from them.



The shame

Jan 21st, 2026 9:36 am | By

Take a deep breath first.



Given the continued and escalating threats

Jan 21st, 2026 9:27 am | By

Oh darn, Trump fucked around and found out.

The European Union’s legislative body on Wednesday halted work on the formal approval and implementation of the trade deal it reached last summer with President Donald Trump.

“Given the continued and escalating threats, including tariff threats, against Greenland and Denmark, and their European allies, we have been left with no alternative but to suspend work” on the deal, said Bernd Lange, the chairman of the European Parliament’s international trade committee.

Wait that’s not supposed to happen. Everybody is supposed to say “we bow before your superior wisdom Sir” – not “ok then no trade deal for you, Donny from Queens.”

On Thursday, leaders of the 27 E.U. countries will meet to discuss their coordinated response to Trump’s Greenland threats.

This may include a package of retaliatory tariffs worth nearly $110 billion, which would impact a wide range of U.S. exports, from Boeing airplanes to soybeans to Kentucky bourbon.

Another potential retaliatory measure would be to deploy the bloc’s “Anti-Coercion Instrument,” a policy option sometimes referred to as the E.U.’s trade “bazooka.”

The ACI would allow the European Commission to target nearly any U.S. goods or services in Europe with a wide range of restrictions and barriers.

Go for it. Turn the heat up. Burn him.



Cultivate your garden instead

Jan 21st, 2026 8:57 am | By

Trump is on a calling-other-people-stupid roll.

Trump on Tuesday accused Britain of “an act of great stupidity” for agreeing to end British sovereignty over the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean, in a blow to Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s attempts to cultivate the president.

In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump abruptly reversed that position and argued that the decision strengthened the case for the United States to acquire Greenland.

“Shockingly, our “brilliant” NATO Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital U.S. Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER,” he wrote.

He added: “The UK giving away extremely important land is an act of GREAT STUPIDITY, and is another in a very long line of National Security reasons why Greenland has to be acquired.”

It’s odd/funny/bizarre that he does that, when stupidity is such a conspicuous and large aspect of what he is and does and is known for. Maybe that’s why he does it – if he calls other people stupid then that makes him not stupid himself. Stupid of him to think that.

It’s a taboo word, of course. I’m violating the taboo whenever I call him stupid, which I do often, despite knowing it’s taboo. It’s taboo for good reasons, but at the same time, it’s a very important part of what’s so wrong about Trump that he is so weak in the intellect yet feels entirely qualified for the job he has. To put it crudely (and tabooly) he’s stupid enough to think he’s not stupid.



Man woman person camera tv

Jan 21st, 2026 8:42 am | By

Trump calls other people stupid.

“If they don’t get this done, they are stupid,” Trump says of President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia reaching a peace deal. Trump, who is now speaking with Borge Brende, the World Economic Forum president, then caveats, “I don’t want to insult anyone,” prompting one person in the crowd to cackle.

Only one?

Many of President Trump’s comments about energy in his speech to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, were not grounded in reality…And China and the United States get a similar share of their electricity from wind turbines — about 10 percent as of 2024, according to data from the research firm Ember Energy and the U.S. Energy Information Administration. In his speech, Trump claimed China sells turbines “to the stupid people that buy them, but they don’t use them themselves.”

Glass houses; stones.



If it is considered safe

Jan 21st, 2026 7:31 am | By

We are sooooooo tired of having to point out the glaringly obvious problem.

Banning biological males who identify as transgender from being placed in female prisons would violate their human rights, the Scottish Government will argue in court.

Not banning men from being placed in female prisons would violate women’s human rights you obtuse clueless head in the sand lunatics.

The campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) has launched a legal challenge seeking to overturn existing prison guidance in Scotland, with a hearing due to begin at the Court of Session on February 3.

Current rules allow trans people to be placed in a prison matching their gender identity if it is considered safe to do so. This does not include those with a history of violence against women and girls, or who are judged to present a risk.

If it is considered safe to do so by whom???

Clearly, by people who are not going to be in those prisons, and so don’t need to worry about the men who don’t wear “RAPIST” badges but are in reality not risk-free if housed in a women’s prison.

FWS argues this is unlawful as ministers are statutorily obliged to provide women-only prison accommodation. It previously won a landmark Supreme Court fight against the Scottish Government over the legal definition of a woman under equality law, which judges ruled is based on biological sex.

In advance of the latest case, the Government has published its note of argument, which argues the position on prisons put forward by FWS contains “fundamental errors” and the Equality Act 2010 “does not mandate sex segregation”.

So the Government is perfectly happy to force women to take their chances.

Susan Smith, a co-director of FWS, said it was “depressing, but not unsurprising, that in page after page referencing human rights, the Scottish Government has, apparently, not considered that women are also human and also have rights”

She added: “Article 3 [of the ECHR] protects everyone from torture, inhuman treatment, or degrading punishment, yet women in, or recently released from, prison tell us the same stories of violation of boundaries and physical or mental abuse from the men they are locked up with.”

It’s almost as if a lot of men really don’t like or respect women. It’s almost as if all of us have grown up in a culture that sees women as contemptible, weak, sly, rebellious, and rapeable.

MSP Tess White said it “beggars belief that SNP ministers are still arguing that male-bodied criminals can be housed in women’s prisons”.

See above.



The big ten

Jan 20th, 2026 5:17 pm | By

The Magic Ten Orders yet again.

The ten orders suck. They’re not just theocratic, they’re bad. Don’t steal; don’t kill; don’t lie. Well no shit; can you not come up with a little more than that? Be compassionate? Don’t hurt others? Be generous? Try to make your part of the world a little better? Can’t you come up with some affirmative suggestions instead of just the most basic don’ts plus a ton of godbothering nonsense?

No, you can’t, so get that crap out of the schools.

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican, who was in the courtroom for the debate, said, “I like our chances.” Asked what he would say to parents who don’t want their children taught the Ten Commandments, he said he would “advise parents like that they find some moral code.”

“You either read the Ten Commandments or your child is going to learn the criminal code,” he said.

Absolutely wrong. The ten are not even close to being a moral code. They are as minimal as they could possibly be on the moral front, and the rest is just monotheistic bullying. There’s not a word about generosity or compassion or helping others. Landry is the one who needs to learn something about morality.

Before Tuesday’s hearing, Texas state Rep. Candy Noble, a Republican and one of the authors of her state’s Ten Commandments law, urged the 5th Circuit judges to back it.

“Returning the Ten Commandments to our Texas classrooms gives our school children an understanding that the Ten Commandments were foundational to America’s educational and judicial systems,” Noble said in a statement.

Nonsense. They’re too minimal and empty to be foundational to anything, as well as being too theocratic to be tolerable to 99 percent of people.



Guest post: You picked the fight

Jan 20th, 2026 4:51 pm | By

Originally a comment by maddog on mostly white.

“We didn’t introduce this fight about sports. This was picked by the other side,” said AJ Hikes, executive director of strategy and culture at the ACLU . . . .

The hell you say! Women and girls were not the ones who introduced the bizarre and dangerous notion that men and boys should be able to shove their way into sports for women and girls, so long as the guys say the magic incantation, “I identify as a woman/girl.” This was a fight picked by men and boys to bully and Lord it over women/girls, to steal their places, steal their victories, literally beat up on them, as well as to satisfy the men’s/boys’ sex perversions by invading the women’s/girls’ private spaces. It’s all very angry, very hateful, very rapey toward women and girls.

You poisoned the well by parasitizing the gay rights movement, and bending the LGB victories and good will to your own purposes, to preempt and prevent any discussion or examination of your dangerous dogmas. You mercilessly bullied and harassed any dissenters from the lie that men/boys could be women/girls. You usurped the power, the machinery, and the money-raising capabilities of successful and established LGB organizations to implant your ideology at the highest institutional levels — you captured the corporate and governmental leadership — to impose your doctrines from above, with no examination or vettng of your claims. The hell you didn’t “introduce” or “pick” this fight; you absolutely did, after having done your best to cut the legs out from under any opposition beforehand. You picked the fight, and it was never a fair fight. It was the old-fashioned boys picking on the girls from the very beginning, only with most people cheering you on this time. Misogyny-coated misogynists, with misogyny filling.



Controlled by

Jan 20th, 2026 11:38 am | By

Powerful ratiocination.

So by the same token the US controls the Oscars and the Pulitzer and the Emmies and the Grammys?


mostly white

Jan 20th, 2026 10:31 am | By

The lies persist:

As the US supreme court heard arguments on Tuesday for a case that could determine whether transgender children can participate in school sports – and potentially impact LGBTQ+ civil rights protections more broadly – competing groups of activists rallied in Washington DC.

First lie. The issue is not whether “trans” children can participate, it’s whether boys can and should play in girls-only sports. If they can’t, they can still participate in boys-only sports. That is participating. It’s not fair to let them ruin sports for girls on the pretext that anything else is preventing them from playing at all. Journalism really needs to stop lying about this.

On one side was a multiracial mix of hundreds of people rallying for trans rights and in support of Becky Pepper-Jackson, a track and field athlete from West Virginia and the plaintiff in the West Virginia v BPJ case before the supreme court.

On the other side was an equally large crowd, mostly white, that was calling on the supreme court to “protect women’s sports” by upholding laws in West Virginia and Idaho that prohibit trans youth from participating in sports programs aligned with their gender identity.

Geddit? Clear enough? Pointed enough? The people who think boys should not ruin girls’ sports are racisssssst.

In many ways, the scene looked like other DC rallies over trans and queer rights over the past decade. Trans advocates and their allies danced to remixes of songs by the pop star Chappell Roan, while those opposing trans rights at one point held a prayer for the legal team representing West Virginia.

Geddit? Trans people are cool and fun. People who think girls should still be allowed to have their own sports are god-botherers and boring. The hip side to take is the one that doesn’t give a shit about girls.

“We didn’t introduce this fight about sports. This was picked by the other side,” said AJ Hikes, executive director of strategy and culture at the ACLU, one of the groups representing Pepper-Jackson, the plaintiff in one of the supreme court cases and the only known trans teen in West Virginia subject to the state ban. “This hyper-focus on sports is yet another example that we have of the ways that they are trying to erase trans and non-binary people from public life.”

This lie is yet another lie. I for one don’t much care about sports as such, but I’m aware that lots of people do and that it’s an area of life where which sex people are does make a huge and important difference. I do care much about fairness to girls and women. I’m not trying to “erase” trans and non-binary people but I am pointing out that those labels are new, and peculiar, and based on the lie that people can change sex.

“This is about power, and it’s about control,” said Chris Mosier, an internationally ranked triathlete who came out as trans in 2010. He said he worries about a broad supreme court ruling that could open the door to more restrictions on trans rights in schools and erode existing LGBTQ+ protections. 

But, again, what are “trans rights” and how do we know and what do we do when they erase women’s rights and girls’ rights? Is there really a “right” for men to play in women’s sports? Not in my book.



Using words like “wild” and “bizarre”

Jan 20th, 2026 10:01 am | By

The Times on Trump’s Davos Show:

Andrew here. I am in Davos, Switzerland, at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum. President Trump is expected to speak here on Wednesday.

The mood: trepidation, for those who are being honest. I attended several events last night, where some C.E.O.s openly questioned the president, using words like “wild” and “bizarre.” Yet many of them are planning to attend a reception in his honor, with some even joking about the best way to praise him in person. “Tread lightly,” one C.E.O. said. Contrast that with a number of international politicians wringing their hands over the growing tensions about Greenland.

Contrast what? It sounds to me like the same thing. They all recognize that Trump is a dangerous moron, and they react with both dismay and jokes.

Already, the U.S. delegation has made clear that it’s not particularly interested in the event’s longtime goal of improving the world through international cooperation and commerce.

President Trump said he would hold a meeting to discuss what many see as his increasingly bellicose efforts to take Greenland from Denmark — but has reiterated that he still wants the semiautonomous territory. And Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent brushed aside potential European responses to Trump’s possible trade war over the island.

It’s easy to “brush them aside” when they haven’t happened yet.



Bored

Jan 20th, 2026 6:57 am | By

Trump’s latest entertainment is creating a “board of peace” that is inclooosive of all the neighborhood warmongers. Countries that don’t join get punished.

Trump has confirmed he invited Vladimir Putin to join a US-proposed Gaza “Board of Peace”.

The board is part of Trump’s 20-point plan to end the Israel-Hamas war and expected to temporarily oversee the running of Gaza and manage its reconstruction.

On Monday, the Kremlin said the Russian president had received the offer. Neither Moscow nor Trump has said whether Putin had accepted.

Washington has asked various world leaders to sit on the board. On Monday, Trump threatened 200% tariffs on French wine after President Emmanuel Macron declined to join.

Well don’t stop there. Put also 200% tariffs on croissants and escargots and pain chocolat and ratatouille and daube de boeuf à la provençale.

The White House’s offer to Putin comes as Russia [has] yet to accept a US-backed peace deal aimed at ending its four-year assault on Ukraine.

Oh that’s ok, it’s just high spirits.

Trump responded to Macron’s decision to decline membership by threatening a 200% tariff on French wine and champagne imports. “He’ll join, but he doesn’t have to join,” Trump added.

He doesn’t have to join but we will punish him if he doesn’t.

In response, a source close to President Macron told the BBC: “Threats to use tariffs to influence our foreign policies are unacceptable and ineffective.”

But they’re fun for Trump.

Other leaders have cautiously responded to the invitations to join the Board of Peace. Morocco’s King Mohammed VI, and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a Trump ally, have accepted roles on the board.

Well that will be a huge help.