Squaring impossibilities

Feminism 101: include men.

So, curious, I looked up the women’s department online. First sentence on the home page?

The Women’s Department exists to advocate for women and non-binary students on campus.

Bolding theirs. But…why? Why can’t a women’s department advocate for women and leave it at that? Why does it also have to advocate for “non-binary students”? What is this constant attack on women for not “including” people who aren’t women?

They have a Women’s Room. It starts well enough, even if the idea of it does make me a bit queasy.

The Women’s Room is a designated women’s safe space. Located on the first floor of Union House, the Women’s Room is an autonomous place where women can feel comfortable and safe to be themselves without having to share the space with men or undergo male scrutiny. It provides a space for women to relax, talk to each other, collaborate, organise, discuss issues or read literature/brochures without embarrassment or self-censorship. It is a non-competitive and supportive space, as well as a great place to meet and get to know amazing women!

Or not such amazing women, because just saying they’re amazing doesn’t actually mean they are. But never mind that – at least they managed to get through a whole paragraph without telling us that the Women’s Room is an autonomous place where women can feel comfortable and also they have to include male people who say they identify as female. That’s refreshing.

But of course it doesn’t last. Paragraph 2 is about the availability of a fridge, lube and condoms, and other essentials. 3 is a one sentence welcome. 4 is…

Please note: the Women’s Room is a safe space. To make sure all women are safe and comfortable in this room, please note that transphobia, racism, ableism, classism, fatphobia and misogyny are not acceptable in this space.

Interesting that “transphobia” is the first item while misogyny is the last. But also – do they mean spoken aloud transphobia? Or transphobia within. Are women who don’t agree that men become women by saying so expected to self-exclude from the Women’s Room? Is there some kind of radar that knows how to detect that particular non-agreement?

Then we get a Do Not Assume and a Do Assume. Under the latter:

1. That all women are welcomed and valued in this space, including trans women.
2. That sex workers use this space and are entitled to respect.
3. That we welcome women of faith to use this space for prayer. Please be considerate where prayer practice may require silence.
4. That we all come from different backgrounds and we all have an equal right to the freedom to be self-expressive without fear of being uncomfortable, unwelcome, or unsafe due to one’s gender assigned at birth, cultural background, age, mental/physical ability, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, gender expression, class.
5. That every one in this room is entitled to respect on the basis of the respect they extend to other perspectives and experiences.

So, it’s an autonomous place where women can feel comfortable and safe to be themselves without having to share the space with men or undergo male scrutiny, but on the other hand trans women are welcomed in the space. Also, we all have a right to the freedom to be self-expressive without fear of being uncomfortable, unwelcome, or unsafe due to our gender assigned at birth or gender expression. So if a woman does feel uncomfortable and unsafe due to being a woman and noticing that there’s a man in the room designate for women? She has a right to the freedom to be self-expressive, but transphobia is not welcome. How, exactly, does that work?

Comments

12 responses to “Squaring impossibilities”

  1. iknklast Avatar

    And, we have to stop anything we might be doing if someone wants to pray (because there are no safe spaces to pray elsewhere, I suppose). So praying transwomen are doubly respected. If they are praying transwomen sex workers, they are da bomb.

    Us boring, ordinary women (including those that do not pray) must put our own things aside when one of the other people enter and demand that we put aside our own needs so they can have what they “need” to feel safe.

  2. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Yes, the bit about praying is also highly obnoxious. It probably doesn’t arise, they probably just put it in there to show how Inkloosivv they are, but it’s still annoying. It’s a group space; you don’t go to a group space to pray in silence; that’s not what it’s for.

  3. Lady Mondegreen Avatar
    Lady Mondegreen

    It’s a joke.

    Also too–

    That sex workers use this space and are entitled to respect.

    I’ve never known a feminist who didn’t respect women who sell or are sold for sex. #2 is there to signal which ideology is acceptable within this “safe space for women.” No speaking ill of pimps or johns, folx, and if you think the Nordic Model makes sense, get out of this inclusive space.

  4. Lady Mondegreen Avatar
    Lady Mondegreen

    (I mean, it’s an unintentional joke. I’m sure the people behind this weren’t joking.)

  5. iknklast Avatar

    Lady M, we’ll know they are joking when they become inclusive of Ewoks, Droids, and Klingons. Oh, and trans-Klingons.

  6. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Oooh I could totally do the trans-Klingon thing.

  7. Acolyte of Sagan Avatar
    Acolyte of Sagan

    Ophelia, you don’t want to do that. A trans-Klingon is the stubborn bit that McKinnon can’t shift with toilet paper.

  8. clamboy Avatar

    “FEMINISIM” – that’s how they spelled the word.

  9. Your Name's not Bruce? Avatar
    Your Name’s not Bruce?

    “FEMINISIM” – that’s how they spelled the word.

    So it’s just a simulation of feminism, then. Clearly not a good one.

    Maybe “feminism” has been removed from their spell-check? Ominous.

    … inclusive of Ewoks, Droids, and Klingons.

    Such a blatant, unsanctioned admixture of franchises and intellectual properties shall not go unpunished. It’s like crossing the streams!! You’ll be hearing from Legal soon.

    Not sure which one, but they’ll all have “Legals.” And you’ll be hearing from one of them.

    If not more.

    Soon.

    You have been warned.

  10. iknklast Avatar

    Not Bruce, I live to cross the streams…maybe that’s why my living room is always full of marshmallows.

  11. John the Drunkard Avatar
    John the Drunkard

    How would a ‘sex worker’s’ use of the space differ from anyone else? Unless they’re tricking with non-binary trans women. Do they really think that sex-workers are going to be in some sort of uniform?

    And just which ‘faiths’ get to impinge on other women by demanding silence? How is anyone going to know who is praying? Well, we can be sure they don’t mean Mormons, its preemptive grovelling in case some Islamist coven wants to take over the room five times a day.

  12. Sackbut Avatar

    The mythical SWERF. Imagined by people who can’t distinguish among pimps, johns, and prostituted women, and think criticizing or arresting one implies the same for all.