Author: Ophelia Benson

  • Merely a reputational inconvenience for Amnesty

    Merched Cymru on Facebook:

    Behind the “anti-rights” headline is a rape crisis centre that has supported more than 1,200 women mostly for rape, sexual assault, childhood sexual abuse and domestic abuse since it opened. Amnesty UK branded it a threat to human rights.

    The Telegraph got inside Beira’s Place, JK Rowling’s Edinburgh centre, and found exactly what you’d expect from an organisation that takes safeguarding seriously: female-only staff, sessions kept calm and private, cabs paid for women who can’t afford them and a genuine understanding that most of these women aren’t dealing with one incident but years of layered trauma. Chief executive Lesley Johnston has worked in this field for 30 years and she says the levels of violence against women and girls she sees now are higher than when she started.

    Since the Amnesty report, no-shows have risen and referrals have dipped. That’s the real cost of being wrongly branded “anti-rights”. While the report was merely a reputational inconvenience for Amnesty, for vulnerable women who need support it has led to hesitation to take up the services they need. Board member Johann Lamont, the former Scottish Labour politician, said it plainly: an organisation with Amnesty’s history “isn’t some random off-the-street thing that thinks it’s a good idea to slag off whoever about anything… it’s significant that they said it.”

    This is what feminism actually looks like in practice: women showing up for other women at their most frightened, asking for nothing except the right to keep doing it. The fact that Amnesty UK felt able to target it shows how deep the misogyny runs with trans rights activism. Women – even those victimised in the most intimate, most traumatic of ways – have been branded as bigots merely for wanting a space to heal from male violence. Amnesty UK can’t apologise enough to them for that.

    And it doesn’t want to apologize to them at all.

  • Oh who cares what’s in the ocean?

    One bit of damage being undone. Thousands more remain.

    Scientists have begun to re-deploy ocean monitoring equipment yanked from Pacific Northwest waters by the Trump administration in September.

    Yanked why? Well, they have a process. Ask: does this cost money? If answer is yes, yank it. Money saved! Win!

    On Monday, an autonomous underwater vehicle called a glider slipped gently off the stern of the Research Vessel Elakha and into the Pacific Ocean about 10 miles offshore from Newport, Oregon.

    Resembling a 6-foot yellow torpedo with wings, the glider is quietly motoring north to waters off Washington state while measuring conditions including rising ocean temperatures and sagging oxygen levels. Three times a day, after diving as much as 3,000 feet deep, it surfaces to transmit its oceanographic data by satellite and receive new instructions from its shore-based operators.

    Well now you see there’s another problem right there. Not only does it cost money, it also tells us things we don’t want to know. The solution is simply to throw it out. If we don’t know about the rising temperatures, the rising temperatures are not happening.

    The larger, stationary observatories that the Trump administration quietly removed last September will take longer to put back.

    Well he removed them for a reason you know. He wanted to.

    The ocean-watching equipment is part of the National Science Foundation’s Ocean Observatories Initiative, which monitors surface and underwater conditions 24/7 off Alaska, North Carolina, the Pacific Northwest, and Greenland.

    The high-tech buoys keep the pulse of the oceans as their temperature and chemistry rapidly change. The buoys also provide real-time updates to Dungeness crabbers and other mariners heading out into possibly dangerous waves. The science foundation calls the observatories “the most technologically advanced observational networks in the oceans.”

    Sounds expensive. Let’s get rid of it.

    In June, the Trump administration backed down from its push to dismantle the observatory networks, with Pacific Northwest devices already removed and others to be pulled by 2027, after pushback from the public and Congress.

    It backed down?! Can we have more of that?

    In an emailed statement in June, National Science Foundation spokesperson Mike England said that the agency remained committed to ocean science despite dismantling — or “descoping” — its ocean-observation network.

    “The decision to descope aligns with NSF’s wider strategy of a nimbler approach to prioritize support for evolving scientific priorities and emerging technologies, as well as smart lifecycle management within its research infrastructure portfolio,” he said.

    Wtf kind of “nimbler” approach is he talking about?? The kind with no technology? Just going to the beach and looking west and taking notes on what they see? Is that smart lifecycle management within its research infrastructure portfolio?

    Answers on a postcard.

  • Charm offensive

    Well, sir, yes, but also no. Mostly no. Of course there are women in all colors shapes and sizes [well not all, but a variety], but funnily enough there’s more to women than color, shape, and size. Quite a lot more. Maybe you don’t understand that on account of not being a woman?

    As for what the fuck do we know, what (may I ask) the fuck do you know? You seem to think being a woman is all about the visuals. You also seem to have a lot of contempt for women, along with some strong dislike. You also, as I mentioned above, seem to think women are about what they look like and nothing else.

    No of course we don’t all have to look the same, but to be women we do have to be the same in certain respects. And no, “some of us [women]” do not have penises. It’s definitional. Rabbits are not as tall as giraffes, and women do not have penises. Here endeth the lesson, without telling you to go fuck yourself.

  • which we should not have

    Amnesty sort of apologizes, while also assuring us how wonderful it is and how not as wonderful everyone else is, especially the people it is sort of apologizing to.

    We apologise for the publication of the briefing “A growing threat: the anti-rights movement in the UK.” This document should never have been published, and full responsibility for this error rests with Amnesty International UK.

    Well the document didn’t publish itself. What do you mean it should never have been published? Who published it? Was it you? If you published it, why are you now saying it should never have been published? Was it someone else? If so, who? It’s not much of an apology if we can’t tell who is sorry or who did what.

    The briefing was taken down within 48 hours of publication, as soon as management were notified of its existence, was not actively promoted, and will not be republished. We have an ongoing internal investigation into how this briefing came to be published.

    What do you mean “was taken down”? Who took it down? Why are there no agents in all this; actions but no person or persons taking them? You do realize we can see it, right? We can see how evasive and impersonal it all is, and we’re not impressed. You seem to be talking about a car crash with no cars.

    Whilst we do not share the views of all these organisations, we recognise the concerns raised by those labelled as “anti-rights” in the document. To be clear: this labelling does not represent our institutional position, and we apologise for its inclusion. In particular, we apologise to Beira’s Place

    Yes we know: because you were going to get your asses sued.

    and other groups, which we categorised as gender critical organisations, which we should not have collectively labelled as anti-rights. We have also taken down an earlier more discursive briefing (entitled Like A Snowball) which also referenced a wide range of organisations.

    Still hasty, perfunctory, non-specific. I am deeply unimpressed. You’re doing the bare minimum and we can tell you’re scowling and sulking while doing it. You’d much rather be calling us all “anti-rights” again.

    AIUK holds itself to the highest standards of research, evidence and editorial oversight in all its publications. We have concluded that this briefing fell significantly short of those standards.

    Wut? You are the very best; you have concluded this item was not the very best. That’s what you’ve got? You’re awesome, except this one time you weren’t quite awesome, now let’s change the subject?

    I am underwhelmed.

    H/t Piglet

  • Oh special off

    The spesh rapporteur in question is Alex Xanthaki.

  • Special indeed

    Eeeeeesh. A UN Special Rapporteur talks the most mind-bogglingly childish drivel here.

    …they have come under pressure from a specific section of women, not all women, not trans women for sure, they are women as well, because women are not defined by sex, they’re defined by gender, and not all biological women, and the reason why they have said they should not be [garbled], you know we go back to the 60s, where others were defining who we are […] all of them are women, the way we define women at the moment is emmm you know on the basis of gender…

    It’s interesting that she pauses and fumbles and says “emmm” and “you know” at that particular point – the point where she has to get specific about what she’s saying. It’s almost as if she knows it’s bullshit and loses her confidence.

    …of experiences, on society and how we view ourselves and how society views us –

    No, sport, that is not the way we “define women”. That’s the way we resist the ideologies that grow up around women and men, it’s not the definition of women and men. Obviously.

  • she hoped

    I think I missed this one at the time. The BBC reports on “Heather” Herbert’s public rejoicing at the violent murder of Ann Widdicomb without ever admitting that he’s a man. You keep waiting for the t-word to appear and it never does – it’s just straight-up she and her throughout.

    Heather Herbert had reportedly posted that Widdecombe’s death on Thursday was “good news” and that she hoped it was an “extremely painful death”.

    Her posts were reported to Police Scotland who initially said there was no criminality in relation to what she had written.

    It’s just plain lying.

  • He’s gutted

    Yet another.

    A women’s health campaigner and former local Labour women’s officer has been banned from the party’s women’s conference because she is trans.

    No, not because he is trans; because he is a man. It’s a women’s conference.

    Steph Richards is ‘gutted’ at her treatment by the party which she said once selected her as a candidate from an all-women shortlist.

    And it shouldn’t have. Men should never be on all-women shortlists.

    Metro revealed yesterday that four powerful Labour unions – Unison, Aslef, Usdaw, and the Musicians’ Union – are boycotting the event over the ban.

    So four powerful Labour unions want men to be able to take what was intended for women. Might as well let the bosses take what was meant for the workers; it makes just as much sense.

  • Following an incident

    Fuck around and find out?

    Seattle Storm minority owner Celeste Keaton has been fined by the WNBA and suspended for her team’s next five home games following an incident Tuesday night involving a pair of Sophie Cunningham fans, the WNBA confirmed to Yahoo Sports’ Cassandra Negley.

    The incident reportedly occurred when the two young women, wearing shirts for a brand advocating against the inclusion of transgender women in women’s sports, held up signs reading “We love you Sophie” and “Thank you Sophie for speaking up for girls” while sitting courtside for the Fever-Storm game. Their appearance came a week after Cunningham made comments against transgender inclusion.

    No, not “transgender inclusion”; male inclusion in women’s sports.

    After the game, the pair recounted to a content producer that a woman, identified as Keaton, confronted them and told them they were “effing insane.”

    Well isn’t that nice – the adult woman who is one of the owners of a women’s team told two girls they are fucking insane, because they don’t think men should be in women’s sports.

    It sounds so different when the wording is accurate. Funny how that works.

  • Men claim victory

    This is a good look. This is a very very very good look. They are right to look so confident and happy with their triumph over women. We are all hugely impressed. Well done three men!

  • Bringing out the best in people

    Wow, that’s a good look.

    Storm apologize after co-owner berates teen girls supporting Sophie Cunningham

    Yes how dare teenage girls support teenage girls who don’t want boys in their sports. Teenage girls are supposed to submit without asking a single question! And by the way so are women!

    The Seattle Storm issued an apology statement Wednesday, one day after one of their co-owners verbally accosted two teenage female fans with expletives because they were holding signs supporting the views of ​Indiana’s Sophie Cunningham during a home game against the Fever.

    The teenagers each had a ‌sign, one saying “Thank You Sophie for speaking up for girls!” Cunningham recently went to bat for the protection of women’s sports and keeping them female-only.

    Independent journalist Brandi Kruse reported that minority owner Celeste Keaton told the girls they ​were “fucking insane.”

    Isn’t that nice? Adults telling teenage girls they’re fucking insane for not wanting to lose everything to boys invading their sports? So enlightened, so progressive, so kind.

  • Of all the possible targets

    Ugh the filth. We’re drowning in it.

    Wednesday’s hearing is very unlikely to be the end of the story. And it could actually grease the skids for Republicans and the Trump administration to do something many of them have openly floated: Trying to put Fauci in prison.

    They’re ostensibly not trying to prosecute Fauci for what he did during the Covid pandemic, but have talked about holding him in contempt of Congress — a threat to initiate a process that would result in the Justice Department considering whether to charge him.

    Fauci indicated he was pleading the Fifth because he feared Republicans would try to lay a perjury trap — i.e. try to get him to say something that could be used to bring a perjury case against him.

    Indeed, some prominent figures had spoken before the hearing about Fauci possibly still being prosecuted for perjury, despite his pardon. They included Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and conservative lawyer John Yoo, who both suggested as much in interviews on Fox News.

    I don’t understand these people.

  • Just force them

    Jolyon is…erm…threatening force against the Charity Commission. That’s a good look.

    Of course what he means by “hate” is just repeating the banal fact that men are not women.

    He wants to force us all to submit to his will. Modest chap.

  • Bad woman says what?

    Well, that’s a nice fair-minded headline.

    ‘She is a stain on society’: Sophie Cunningham’s anti-trans comments lead to ‘digusting’ rally and spark outrage

    One two three four. She is a stain on society; her comments are anti-trans; they lead to disgusting rally; they spark outrage. Got all that? Are you sure you hate her enough yet?

    Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham, who is averaging 9.3 points off the bench this season, had a feature published by ESPN where she spoke about what she felt was necessary to “protect women’s sports.”

    Ooooh that bitch. How dare she think it’s necessary to protect women’s sports. What does that even mean? “Protect” how? What tf even are “””women’s sports”””?

    When approached about her stance by local media, Cunningham doubled down, saying, “I said what I said.”

    Oooh how dare she stick by what she said? How dare she not crumble and weep hot tears and apologize and call herself names and promise to submit no matter what?

    Now, the ramifications of Cunningham’s comments are being felt by the already vulnerable trans community.

    Oh oh oh oh the already vulnerable trans communninny oh that’s so sad – the ramifications! Good thing nobody else is vulnerable.

  • First in Our Nation’s History

    Well whose fault is that?

    Attorneys for President Donald Trump filed a petition Tuesday to toss the more than $83.3 million judgment in the defamation case brought by former magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll.

    “This is the first case in our Nation’s history in which a court has imposed damages liability on a President for his conduct in office,” the filing states.

    It’s the first time in our history that a president has been such a worthless evil sadistic women-hating abusive violent rapey shit. He is by far the worst human being who has ever had that job; no one else even comes close. He makes Nixon look like a saint. He has not one single redeeming quality. He’s not charming or funny or witty, he’s not generous or kind or loyal, he’s not interesting or well-informed or thoughtful. It’s not anyone else’s fault that he’s the first president to be entangled in such a disgusting brawl.

    The petition went on to argue, “If left standing, the decision below will cause significant damage, not only to this President and future Presidents, but also to ‘the Nation that the Presidency was designed to serve.’

    “As this Court has recognized, it ‘would seriously cripple the proper and effective administration of’ government if Presidents feared that their official acts could result in damages liability…

    Excuse me. How is his revolting treatment of Carroll in any way an official act?

    He’ll be raping and then eating toddlers next.

  • Define your terms

    Again with the obfuscatory language.

    What “discriminatory” treatment? In what sense of “discriminatory”?

    We are allowed to discriminate between women and men in the sense of knowing which is which and sometimes acting accordingly. Sometimes it doesn’t matter which is which, and other times it does.

    See also: children and adults. There are many circumstances in which it’s necessary to discriminate between them. Discrimination is not always or automatically invidious; it’s often necessary. Triage is discrimination. In an emergency you don’t treat the person with the scratch before the person who is bleeding out.

    Humans are either one sex or the other. It’s not invidious discrimination to be clear about which is which and act accordingly.

  • Met with a lot of criticism

    They just can’t report it honestly. Not ever.

    Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham has made headlines this week as she spoke out against transgender women in women’s sports. While her comments have been met with a lot of criticism, she has received some support from a high-profile author who has similarly criticized transgender people.

    It’s not about “criticizing trans people”. It’s about objecting to men invading women’s sports.

    In an ESPN article last week, Cunningham was asked about her political beliefs and the “MAGA Barbie” nickname she has recently been given. While Cunningham says that label is a projection, given that she is a white girl from Missouri, she did go on to speak out on how to “protect women’s sports.”

    No scare quotes on “that label is a projection” or “a white girl from Missouri”; only on “protect women’s sports.” Funny how that works.

    Later in the week, Cunningham was given the opportunity to address the comments, ahead of a game against the Connecticut Sun. During that interview, Cunningham doubled down on her statement.

    Oh no, really? You mean she failed to withdraw it? How shocking.

    Cunningham was asked if she thought her comments could be viewed as derogatory toward trans athletes. She responded, saying that she does not “dislike anyone” and there is “room to love everyone.” However, she wasn’t backing down from her opinion.

    How dare she!

    While not everyone has been pleased with Cunningham’s political stand, Rowling did come to her support with a post on X.

    The Harry Potter author, who has a history of speaking out against transgender rights, praised Cunningham for “standing up for women and girls everywhere.”

    That’s just a lie. JKR doesn’t “speak out against transgender rights”. She doesn’t think or say that trans people should not have rights. The problem is that there are new claimed rights that are not rights at all, and that are destructive of women’s rights. Men who call themselves women don’t have any right to help themselves to everything that belongs to women.

  • After a video showed

    Well what did they think was going to happen?

    Two transgender netball players have been banned from competing in Australia after a video showed one of them knocking an opponent to the ground.

    Rival teams threatened a boycott over footage of Melton Central player Manawa Aranui sending a member of the Romsey team crashing to the court.

    There was no foul and Aranui, who played elite men’s netball before transition, is seen offering to help the opponent to her feet.

    So typical of journalism on this subject that it casually neglects to spell out the key fact here. What kind of “transgender netball players” eh Telegraph? Are they possibly male at all? If so why not say so in the lede? You pathetic chickenshits.

    However, following a host of complaints, Victoria’s Riddell District Football Netball League (RDFNL) announced the two trans Melton Central team-mates were now excluded from competition.

    That is, the two male Melton Central team-mates. The word “trans” does not specify sex or gender, so you have to spell it out. It’s your job to report clearly and accurately on this manipulative evasive sly sneaky campaign to let men ruin women’s sports.

    Melton South Netball Club had threatened to boycott matches against Melton Central due to safety concerns. The RDFNL acknowledges the pair “exhibit superior stamina and physique” in a statement explaining the ban.

    “After lengthy consideration and consultation, the RDFNL has ruled that the two transgender participants be excluded from the RDFNL netball competitions for the remainder of the 2025 season on the premise that both participants exhibit superior stamina and physique over their competitors, deeming Section 42 of the Sex Discrimination Act relevant,” a statement said.

    All this yet the Telegraph still finds it necessary to be hyper-“polite” to the massive shits invading women’s sports and threatening women’s safety.

    Melton South’s netball coordinator Melissa Dawson subsequently told News Corp reporters in Australia that she would support her players if they chose to forfeit games over safety concerns.

    “One of the players is six foot something – it’s ridiculous,” she said. “Netball Victoria needs to put the safety of biological females first.”

    In response, a furious Aranui said on Facebook: “I’ve sat quietly long enough while this narrative brewed and I’ve been dragged – publicly and without consent – into a conversation where both my character and identity have been attacked. Now, it’s exploded across social media and news outlets.”

    Cheating cheater says what?

    Update: This happened a year ago, but I missed it then, so here it is now.

  • It’s incenjeri old chap

    Euan identifies as a legal expert.

    Why hasn’t Julie Bindel been arrested and charged for saying something Euan Weddell doesn’t like?

    It’s an outrage!

    Also, never mind is two words.

  • One day a baseball star

    Is Trump a malignant narcissist?

    On Monday [several months ago], the president contradicted himself no fewer than five times regarding his plans in Iran, after weeks of simultaneously insisting that the United States had won the war and that much remained to be done. Hours later, he posted several incomprehensible messages on his Truth Social platform, retweeting flattering news stories about himself published months earlier. And not too long ago, there was the letter to the prime minister of Norway criticizing him for not awarding him the Nobel Prize, even though it wasn’t within the monarch’s power to do so; there was also the speech full of insults directed at his allies in Davos; and that news conference in which he launched into a monologue about a mental institution in Queens and his mother’s belief that he would one day be a baseball star.

    For his supporters and for members of his Administration, all this only proves the unorthodox personality of the president, as well as the unpredictable and approachable style of someone who has no regard for the conventions of traditional politics and who has created around his own figure an almost cult-like movement that is unprecedented in the recent history of the United States.

    Yeah well to the extent that’s true, they’re all deranged. Trump is indeed “unorthodox” but that’s not the salient thing about him. Not within a million miles.

    [Johns Hopkins University psychologist John] Gartner has been warning about Trump’s “mental disorders” for a decade, and he has no doubt about them. “He is a malignant narcissist,” the psychologist explained in a video conference with EL PAÍS. He explained that this is an illness described by Holocaust survivor Erich Fromm to diagnose Hitler, and that, according to the doctor, it has these components: “Narcissism, of course—many politicians have it—antisocial personality disorder (psychopathy) —they lie, deceive, harm others, violate the rules, and feel no remorse—paranoia—they constantly feel attacked and, therefore, seek revenge—grandiosity—their desire is to dominate and be above everyone else; ‘I am the best president in history,’ ‘nobody knows more than me about tariffs,’ etc.—and sadism: they enjoy chaos, destruction, and humiliation.”

    To put it another way: is he a narcissist? Well duh. Is he malignant? Duh again.

    Vince Greenwood, founder of the Washington Center for Cognitive Therapy—who since 2020 has focused on studying Trump’s psychopathy, on which he plans to publish a book in August—says via videoconference that for that specific disorder, “one of the best-defined in the American psychiatric manual,” an interview is not necessary “if a large amount of data on the patient’s life history is available.” “It is, fundamentally, a disorder of long-standing behavioral patterns and traits, manifested over decades,” explains Greenwood. 

    What I’m saying. He’s obviously narcissistic and obviously malignant. You do the math.

    That “danger” has only worsened, according to Frank George, a psychologist, neuroscientist, and author of the popular substack Gaslight Report, in which he writes about Trump’s mental health. In a video conference interview, he explained that narcissism is a disorder that accompanies people from birth, and that it is “influenced by the patient’s circumstances, environment, or upbringing.” “It’s like heart disease; eating hamburgers every day doesn’t help. If you manage your narcissism, you may not end up being the most generous and empathetic person, but at least you’ll have it under control. That’s not the case with Trump: his parents didn’t help, nor did his time at military school, where he learned that being a bully worked for him. Becoming the most powerful person in the world did the rest, transforming him from a pathological narcissist into a malignant narcissist,” George explains.

    He sure as hell doesn’t have it under control.

    He also shows symptoms of frontotemporal dementia.

    “When people hear the word dementia, they usually think of Alzheimer’s, but that’s not what’s happening to him,” he explains. “FTD affects the frontal and temporal lobes. The frontal lobes are where what makes us most human resides; thanks to that part of the brain, we can plan, make rational decisions, and think things through. With this type of dementia, it’s as if the neurological guardrails disappear.”

    Among the symptoms of FTD is confabulation, which goes beyond simply making up stories. It’s not lying; it’s believing what one says, however implausible it may seem. Another symptom, George explains, is paraphasia: “making mistakes with words, mispronouncing them, or not knowing how to finish them.” “A third symptom is insistence: how many times has he listed the wars he’s won?” George asks, adding that FTD “makes his narcissism manifest itself more starkly.”

    Worrying at all?