Author: Ophelia Benson

  • Define your terms

    Again with the obfuscatory language.

    What “discriminatory” treatment? In what sense of “discriminatory”?

    We are allowed to discriminate between women and men in the sense of knowing which is which and sometimes acting accordingly. Sometimes it doesn’t matter which is which, and other times it does.

    See also: children and adults. There are many circumstances in which it’s necessary to discriminate between them. Discrimination is not always or automatically invidious; it’s often necessary. Triage is discrimination. In an emergency you don’t treat the person with the scratch before the person who is bleeding out.

    Humans are either one sex or the other. It’s not invidious discrimination to be clear about which is which and act accordingly.

  • Met with a lot of criticism

    They just can’t report it honestly. Not ever.

    Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham has made headlines this week as she spoke out against transgender women in women’s sports. While her comments have been met with a lot of criticism, she has received some support from a high-profile author who has similarly criticized transgender people.

    It’s not about “criticizing trans people”. It’s about objecting to men invading women’s sports.

    In an ESPN article last week, Cunningham was asked about her political beliefs and the “MAGA Barbie” nickname she has recently been given. While Cunningham says that label is a projection, given that she is a white girl from Missouri, she did go on to speak out on how to “protect women’s sports.”

    No scare quotes on “that label is a projection” or “a white girl from Missouri”; only on “protect women’s sports.” Funny how that works.

    Later in the week, Cunningham was given the opportunity to address the comments, ahead of a game against the Connecticut Sun. During that interview, Cunningham doubled down on her statement.

    Oh no, really? You mean she failed to withdraw it? How shocking.

    Cunningham was asked if she thought her comments could be viewed as derogatory toward trans athletes. She responded, saying that she does not “dislike anyone” and there is “room to love everyone.” However, she wasn’t backing down from her opinion.

    How dare she!

    While not everyone has been pleased with Cunningham’s political stand, Rowling did come to her support with a post on X.

    The Harry Potter author, who has a history of speaking out against transgender rights, praised Cunningham for “standing up for women and girls everywhere.”

    That’s just a lie. JKR doesn’t “speak out against transgender rights”. She doesn’t think or say that trans people should not have rights. The problem is that there are new claimed rights that are not rights at all, and that are destructive of women’s rights. Men who call themselves women don’t have any right to help themselves to everything that belongs to women.

  • After a video showed

    Well what did they think was going to happen?

    Two transgender netball players have been banned from competing in Australia after a video showed one of them knocking an opponent to the ground.

    Rival teams threatened a boycott over footage of Melton Central player Manawa Aranui sending a member of the Romsey team crashing to the court.

    There was no foul and Aranui, who played elite men’s netball before transition, is seen offering to help the opponent to her feet.

    So typical of journalism on this subject that it casually neglects to spell out the key fact here. What kind of “transgender netball players” eh Telegraph? Are they possibly male at all? If so why not say so in the lede? You pathetic chickenshits.

    However, following a host of complaints, Victoria’s Riddell District Football Netball League (RDFNL) announced the two trans Melton Central team-mates were now excluded from competition.

    That is, the two male Melton Central team-mates. The word “trans” does not specify sex or gender, so you have to spell it out. It’s your job to report clearly and accurately on this manipulative evasive sly sneaky campaign to let men ruin women’s sports.

    Melton South Netball Club had threatened to boycott matches against Melton Central due to safety concerns. The RDFNL acknowledges the pair “exhibit superior stamina and physique” in a statement explaining the ban.

    “After lengthy consideration and consultation, the RDFNL has ruled that the two transgender participants be excluded from the RDFNL netball competitions for the remainder of the 2025 season on the premise that both participants exhibit superior stamina and physique over their competitors, deeming Section 42 of the Sex Discrimination Act relevant,” a statement said.

    All this yet the Telegraph still finds it necessary to be hyper-“polite” to the massive shits invading women’s sports and threatening women’s safety.

    Melton South’s netball coordinator Melissa Dawson subsequently told News Corp reporters in Australia that she would support her players if they chose to forfeit games over safety concerns.

    “One of the players is six foot something – it’s ridiculous,” she said. “Netball Victoria needs to put the safety of biological females first.”

    In response, a furious Aranui said on Facebook: “I’ve sat quietly long enough while this narrative brewed and I’ve been dragged – publicly and without consent – into a conversation where both my character and identity have been attacked. Now, it’s exploded across social media and news outlets.”

    Cheating cheater says what?

    Update: This happened a year ago, but I missed it then, so here it is now.

  • It’s incenjeri old chap

    Euan identifies as a legal expert.

    Why hasn’t Julie Bindel been arrested and charged for saying something Euan Weddell doesn’t like?

    It’s an outrage!

    Also, never mind is two words.

  • One day a baseball star

    Is Trump a malignant narcissist?

    On Monday [several months ago], the president contradicted himself no fewer than five times regarding his plans in Iran, after weeks of simultaneously insisting that the United States had won the war and that much remained to be done. Hours later, he posted several incomprehensible messages on his Truth Social platform, retweeting flattering news stories about himself published months earlier. And not too long ago, there was the letter to the prime minister of Norway criticizing him for not awarding him the Nobel Prize, even though it wasn’t within the monarch’s power to do so; there was also the speech full of insults directed at his allies in Davos; and that news conference in which he launched into a monologue about a mental institution in Queens and his mother’s belief that he would one day be a baseball star.

    For his supporters and for members of his Administration, all this only proves the unorthodox personality of the president, as well as the unpredictable and approachable style of someone who has no regard for the conventions of traditional politics and who has created around his own figure an almost cult-like movement that is unprecedented in the recent history of the United States.

    Yeah well to the extent that’s true, they’re all deranged. Trump is indeed “unorthodox” but that’s not the salient thing about him. Not within a million miles.

    [Johns Hopkins University psychologist John] Gartner has been warning about Trump’s “mental disorders” for a decade, and he has no doubt about them. “He is a malignant narcissist,” the psychologist explained in a video conference with EL PAÍS. He explained that this is an illness described by Holocaust survivor Erich Fromm to diagnose Hitler, and that, according to the doctor, it has these components: “Narcissism, of course—many politicians have it—antisocial personality disorder (psychopathy) —they lie, deceive, harm others, violate the rules, and feel no remorse—paranoia—they constantly feel attacked and, therefore, seek revenge—grandiosity—their desire is to dominate and be above everyone else; ‘I am the best president in history,’ ‘nobody knows more than me about tariffs,’ etc.—and sadism: they enjoy chaos, destruction, and humiliation.”

    To put it another way: is he a narcissist? Well duh. Is he malignant? Duh again.

    Vince Greenwood, founder of the Washington Center for Cognitive Therapy—who since 2020 has focused on studying Trump’s psychopathy, on which he plans to publish a book in August—says via videoconference that for that specific disorder, “one of the best-defined in the American psychiatric manual,” an interview is not necessary “if a large amount of data on the patient’s life history is available.” “It is, fundamentally, a disorder of long-standing behavioral patterns and traits, manifested over decades,” explains Greenwood. 

    What I’m saying. He’s obviously narcissistic and obviously malignant. You do the math.

    That “danger” has only worsened, according to Frank George, a psychologist, neuroscientist, and author of the popular substack Gaslight Report, in which he writes about Trump’s mental health. In a video conference interview, he explained that narcissism is a disorder that accompanies people from birth, and that it is “influenced by the patient’s circumstances, environment, or upbringing.” “It’s like heart disease; eating hamburgers every day doesn’t help. If you manage your narcissism, you may not end up being the most generous and empathetic person, but at least you’ll have it under control. That’s not the case with Trump: his parents didn’t help, nor did his time at military school, where he learned that being a bully worked for him. Becoming the most powerful person in the world did the rest, transforming him from a pathological narcissist into a malignant narcissist,” George explains.

    He sure as hell doesn’t have it under control.

    He also shows symptoms of frontotemporal dementia.

    “When people hear the word dementia, they usually think of Alzheimer’s, but that’s not what’s happening to him,” he explains. “FTD affects the frontal and temporal lobes. The frontal lobes are where what makes us most human resides; thanks to that part of the brain, we can plan, make rational decisions, and think things through. With this type of dementia, it’s as if the neurological guardrails disappear.”

    Among the symptoms of FTD is confabulation, which goes beyond simply making up stories. It’s not lying; it’s believing what one says, however implausible it may seem. Another symptom, George explains, is paraphasia: “making mistakes with words, mispronouncing them, or not knowing how to finish them.” “A third symptom is insistence: how many times has he listed the wars he’s won?” George asks, adding that FTD “makes his narcissism manifest itself more starkly.”

    Worrying at all?

  • Burn the witch

    Here is the message that an Australian court has ordered Kirralie Smith to pin to all her social media whatsits.

    PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE LOCAL COURT OF NSW AS VARIED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NSW Following proceedings in the Local Court of NSW (2024/78280) the Local Court of NSW has declared that Kirralie Smith and Binary Australia contravened section 38S of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1997 (NSW) by making and publishing various social media posts between 19 January 2023 and 27 March 2023 and a newsletter dated 19 January 2023 that incited hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of a soccer player on the ground that she is a transgender person. Public acts that incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the ground that the person or group are transgender are unlawful under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). The Local Court of NSW has ordered Kirralie Smith and Binary Australia to pay damages to the soccer player, and to remove the offending posts and to not repeat or continue the offending behaviour.

    But it’s not “on the ground that she is a transgender person”. Not not not. It’s on the ground that he is a male person. We don’t give a shit whether people call themselves transgender or not. We give a shit about men calling themselves women and then taking all our stuff and forcing themselves on us in our own spaces.

    Courts abusing women for refusing to call men “women” is not social justice, not progressive, not lefty, not liberal, not reasonable, not sane, not fair, not decent, not ok, not acceptable.

  • Direct action

    Time to say no, perhaps?

    Ministers should consider proscribing a militant transgender activist group which has targeted the offices of MPs, the government’s former adviser on political violence has said.

    Writing in The Times, Lord Walney said the conduct of the group Bash Back “deserves far more serious attention than it has so far received” and that ministers should test it against the same threshold that led to the proscription of Palestine Action.

    Bash Back is a transgender-led direct action group which vandalised the office of Wes Streeting in July last year when he was the health secretary, and it has pushed for a “new era of trans rage”. 

    It’s not really a good fit, is it. The rhetoric doesn’t mesh with the cause. Passion and anger can work when the cause is righteous enough – stop the mass slaughter, end the torture, do away with the system that subordinates millions of people. When the cause is “fawn over men who insist that they are women” it doesn’t work so well. It’s too trivial, too niche, too fictional, too childish, too silly. The result is that demands for rage come across as entitled and coercive.

    The Times previously revealed that the group had produced a guide for members urging them to arm themselves and carry out repeated illegal attacks on MPs and organisations.

    There again, a flimsy and inherently narcissistic cause stumbles at the first step. If you’re going to go all militant you want to have a decent reason for it.

    It told activists to form “independent local cells”, “identify a target” — including MPs, organisations and political party conferences — and “ensure your target can be hit repeatedly until they desist” from their “transphobic” activities.

    It’s not accidental that that looks like telling people to resort to physical violence against people while leaving room to say “Oh no, we mean their offices and organizations.” Please. If they really meant that and only that, they would have said that and only that. The not doing so is absolutely intentional.

    Walney stressed that he made no suggestion about who was responsible while proceedings were active, but said it was “a fair observation” that Bash Back had withdrawn none of its material since her death.

    “Not one image of masked, hammer-wielding activists. Not the guide instructing supporters to select political targets and strike them until they desist,” he said. 

    The implications of which, I repeat, are extremely obvious.

    “An organisation genuinely committed to non-violence, watching the country absorb the killing of a public figure in her own home, would have paused. This one did not.”

    Let’s be real here. An organisation genuinely committed to non-violence would not have said all that about striking targets until they desist.

    In a statement posted on social media, Bash Back said: “We completely reject the idea that we are a ‘terrorist’ group. We are a non-violent direct action group that demands the total liberation of trans people, and opposes the rising tide of anti-trans bigotry.”

    Nope. All those threats, all those images of snarling men brandishing hammers, are not “non-violent”. It’s violence by wink wink nudge nudge.

  • Brick by brick

    Now Trump is wanting to kill off the International Criminal Court. Well of course he is, being an international criminal.

    Barely a month appears to go by without Donald Trump making a fresh attempt to destroy the international rules-based order. The US has pulled funding from dozens of international institutions, shut down USAID and withdrawn from the Paris climate agreement. Nato may survive on paper, but Trump has made clear that he has little interest in coming to the aid of any ally that is attacked. The Board of Peace is clearly an attempt to sideline the United Nations.

    But the state department’s announcement last week that it wishes to dismantle the international criminal court “brick by brick” could be Trump’s most frightening move of all.

    I missed the State Department’s announcement of that. How appalling.

    It is now official US policy to destroy the ICC, and the administration is prepared to go to extraordinary lengths to do so.

    Nations that do not fall into line will be punished. The state department has promised “increased scrutiny of nations that refuse to reject the ICC’s false authority while relying on US assistance”, particularly targeting those countries that “enjoy the benefits of the US security umbrella”. That will include the UK, a country that contributes just over £15m a year to the ICC, making it the fourth largest donor after Japan, Germany and France.

    The state department campaign also includes working with other nations that are not part of the ICC, suggesting that the US could ally itself with Russia and China.

    Make no mistake, this is an existential crisis not just for the ICC but the very idea of international justice. The most powerful nation on Earth and the supposed leader of the democratic west is aligning itself with dictators and autocrats to prevent those accused of genocide, ethnic cleansing and war crimes from ever facing justice.

    The question now is what the “rest of the west” will do in response to Trump’s attacks. The court’s biggest donors need to stay strong and not give in to intimidation. It will be an early test for Ed Miliband, who said upon his appointment as foreign secretary on Monday that “we face a time of greater instability and threat to international law … than at any time since the second world war”.

    The ICC’s imperfections undoubtedly make it a harder institution to defend. Those weaknesses can be magnified and targeted, making the court’s natural defenders reluctant to man the barricades.

    Yet that is exactly what needs to happen. Even when it is badly run or cases are poorly constructed, the ICC’s very existence can have an impact. Netanyahu and Putin will for ever be referred to as men indicted for war crimes. Their worlds have shrunk thanks to the threat of arrest. The Philippines’ former president, Rodrigo Duterte, is on trial, accused of crimes against humanity during his “war on drugs”.

    This is why Trump is so determined to shut it down, argues Luis Moreno Ocampo, the court’s first chief prosecutor. “Trump knows he could be a target after he leaves office,” he told me. “The ICC is a huge obstacle for him.”

    He doesn’t need to worry about that. He’s not going to live long enough.

  • A giggle too many

    Nothing like “jokes” about assassination to liven up the party.

    Police are “conducting inquiries” into an image shared by Green party leader Zack Polanski on Instagram after Reform UK reported it for “inciting murder”.

    The image showed a man wearing a black T-shirt with the words “we’re only making plans for Nigel”, alongside a photograph of a guillotine.

    Any jokes about hammers, Zack? You whimsical guy you!

    Green party spokesperson said that Polanski “condemns the image on the T-shirt” and accepted being tagged in a post with 20 images “without realising there was more to it than he had seen”.

    Nigel Farage shared a screenshot of the image on X and wrote: “This is what Zack Polanski has just posted on his Instagram.

    “If I was to post anything as inciteful then I would expect to be arrested, and so should Polanski.”

    Stop right there. There is no such word as “inciteful”. There is “insightful”; the meaning is entirely different. The wording should be “If I were to post anything as likely to incite murder” – but anyway, he’s right about Polanski.

    Reform UK’s spokesperson for home affairs, Zia Yusuf, said Polanski was “inciting murder”, and that sharing the image weeks after the death of former Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe, who was murdered in her home in Devon, was “staggering”.

    Not even three weeks yet.

  • Guest post: The fires in the region

    Originally a comment by Athel Cornish-Bowen on What was your first clue?

    The only thing they’ve talked about on the news for the past two or three days has been the fires in the region of Bordeaux. They’ve kept everything else a secret, so if Trump has been assassinated I’ve haven’t been told. It has been understood for decades that if you don’t want forest fires you should clear the undergrowth regularly before it dries out, and you shouldn’t plant endless rows of identical trees, and emphatically not pines. So what do they do? They don’t enforce the laws about clearing the undergrowth, and they plant endless rows of pines of uniform size. Unfortunately, what we learn from experience is that we don’t learn from experience.

    Fires close to Bordeaux are not partcularly frequent, but they do occur, and there was a very bad one in 2022. In the Var, much nearer to where I live, they are close to being an annual problem. Again, they don’t seem to be doing all they could to prevent them. Here in Marseilles we had a spell of heavy rain on Saturday, so we we should be safe for a while.

  • Warm

    Remember, global warming is just something made up by Marxists to tease the bourgeoisie.

    Firefighters in France and Spain are racing to bring huge wildfires under control before another heatwave this week that will complicate efforts to tame the flames.

    Spain’s interior minister, Fernando Grande-Marlaska, said Monday and Tuesday were “absolutely crucial days” before temperatures rise again from Wednesday.

    EU officials have said wildfires could still be burning until early November in what threatens to be a record-breaking year for the area of land burned.

    The Gironde fire has so far burned 42,000 hectares, making it one of the biggest devastations of land in France since the second world war.

    The vast fire, which has triggered the evacuation of 220,000 people, had not progressed during the early hours of Monday but was “not contained” and remained “very complicated to control”, Nuñez said.

    Speaking after an emergency meeting of the French government on Monday, he described this year’s wildfires as “completely exceptional”. More than 116,000 hectares of forest and vegetation have been burned since January, far exceeding the 70,000 hectares reported for the whole of 2025.

    A series of heatwaves, including record-breaking temperatures in June, that scientists say would have been impossible without the climate crisis, has left parched soils and tinder-dry vegetation that have fuelled this summer’s fires.

    The scale of Europe’s wildfires has raised questions about the continent’s ability to respond. Italy is among about 10 European countries that have sent firefighting equipment or teams to France and Spain while grappling with its own blazes.

    Firefighters fought to extinguish a major wildfire in the southern region of Puglia on Monday. More than 400 people, many of them tourists staying in campsites set among pine forests, were evacuated by sea from the Gargano peninsula on Sunday as the blaze, fanned by strong winds, encroached on beaches.

    Qu’ils mangent de la brioche.

  • For many women

    An impassioned account of why women’s sport matters:

    For many women around the world, sport is a pathway to a different future. It can lead to educational opportunities, financial provision for whole families and a freedom to express themselves. All of those potentials, which athletes have spent their lives training in order to achieve, are taken away in one fell swoop. It can be a devastating psychological and material blow.

    And yet, bizarrely enough, the context of that sympathetic explanation is a defense of men in women’s sports.

  • A direct action group?

    Hmm.

    But sir, they announce their commitment to violence themselves. They’re proud of it. They glory in it. Meanwhile For Women Scotland does not threaten violence. Do you get it now? Bash Back promises violence, For Women Scotland does not. Clear?

  • What was your first clue?

    Oh gosh, who could possibly have foreseen that a town built in a desert might run low on water? It’s just so random and weird and out of nowhere.

    Mayor Curtis Stacy starts every morning checking two websites that tell him how much he needs to worry about water.

    One site tells him about the reservoir that supplies his tiny desert town — it’s effectively empty. The other site tells him if the town gets additional water that other communities with more senior rights aren’t using; right now, the answer is yes.

    But Stacy tries to remind Kearny’s roughly 2,000 residents that they could easily tip back into crisis mode, just like this spring. In newsletters, he underscores that fragility with no less than 20 exclamation points. If other communities call for more water, they will have to cut back again.

    You see, this is because it’s in a desert. What is a desert? It’s a place with little or no water. If you build a town in a desert, even a tiny town, it’s going to have little or no water, because of the “in a desert” part. If you like having plenty of water, don’t live in a desert.

    Kearny is an extreme example of the water crunch facing communities across the West as states and cities stare down a future of “megadrought” and fight over scarce resources. An unusually dry winter this year left the Southwest parched, with not enough water for everyone laying claim to it.

    Kearny is in Arizona. There’s a reason Arizona is called Arizona.

    The town tried to prepare residents late last year for what was coming. In a Dec. 29 letter, officials warned that the reservoir fed by their primary water source, the Gila River, was running low.

    The first question in the FAQ section was, “What happens if our allotment is zero?”

    Answer: “Severe restrictions will be imposed.”

    Why? Because if the water isn’t there, then it isn’t there. Mayors can’t wave a magic wand and cause it to be there.

    In late March, Kearny imposed “Level 5″ restrictions on water — the most stringent possible. A declaration of emergency told residents they could use water only for the essentials; the mayor went door to door to convey the situation’s gravity. There would be no washing of cars, no kiddie pools, and no watering of grass. Even the Little League field would go dry.

    Ffs. People have to be told this? Of course you don’t wash the damn cars or water the damn grass in a drought.

    At the bar across the street from the Little League field, people wondered when the monsoon season would bring some real rain. But everyone thought the town would get through the water crisis. When Kathy Taft asked her friend Dave Olsen if the town was “really going to run out of water,” Olsen answered without hesitation.

    “No,” he said. “I just don’t see that happening.”

    Oh well then. Dave just doesn’t see it happening, so it won’t happen.

  • Do they understand the words?

    They just will not follow the law.

    A police force is placing biological men in women’s cells despite the Supreme Court ruling that transgender women are not legally women.

    Staffordshire Police says its custody policy means “detainees may be placed in accommodation consistent with their gender identity”, The Telegraph can reveal.

    That means biological men who identify as transgender women can be placed in women’s-only custody cells.

    Which is both unsafe and unfair for women.

    The force introduced the rules in the wake of last April’s Supreme Court ruling that sex in equality law refers to biological sex, which has been widely interpreted as meaning that biological men cannot use female single-sex facilities.

    But…”sex refers to biological sex” should lead to not housing men with women. Not, you see. Not doing it, but not doing it. Did no one explain?

    Its revised policies commit to allowing a person to self-identify their chosen gender.

    But you were supposed to revise your stupid policies in the other direction, you fucking fools.

    Cathy Larkman, a director of the Women’s Rights Network and a retired police superintendent, said: “These policies do not comply with the Supreme Court judgment, and they indicate a level of ignorance with the law and a disregard for the rights of women that is deeply concerning.”

    Not to mention a level of just plain stupid.

    Staff are expected to “uphold inclusive language” and will be given training on “respectful” pronoun use.

    Oh shut up. It’s not “inclusive” to call men women. It’s an insult and a threat to women; not inclusive.

    When asked to clarify whether this meant that they would be therefore searched by a female officer, the force said that a GRC did not “automatically” determine search policy.

    The policy sets out that trans people can request to be “searched by someone of their lived gender” as long as the detainee and officers agree.

    There’s no such thing as “lived gender”. Silly trans jargon is just silly trans jargon; institutions like the police should have no truck with it.

    Terence Stock, a former member of the force’s Independent Advisory Group, who obtained the policies using FOI laws, said: “Clinging to outdated policies is a clear failure of the core moral duty of policing.

    “It is unforgivable that Staffordshire Police still fails to reflect fully the For Women Scotland Supreme Court judgment and the clear same-sex requirement in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act.

    “Intimate searches are among the most intrusive powers imaginable, and disproportionately affect women with histories of trauma and sexual violence. Police forces must follow the law, protect those in custody, and treat sex as the biological reality it is – not continue to make concessions that put women at risk.”

    How many more times do they need to be told?

  • Lights on!

    Oh good, a new horrible idea for how to mess with the planet and the sky and night and day.

    The federal government has approved plans by a start-up company to test a satellite that would use a 60-foot mirror to reflect sunlight back to Earth after dark, as part of a project the company says would power solar farms, provide light for rescue workers and illuminate city streets.

    In a license issued on Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission gave the green light for Reflect Orbital of Hawthorne, Calif., to launch its Eärendil-1 satellite into low Earth orbit. The company plans to deploy its test satellite this year but has said it eventually wants to send as many as 50,000 big mirrors into space.

    Listen up. We evolved on a planet that has day and night. We need both. We rely on our circadian rhythms. We don’t need elonmusk types blasting sunlight at us at 2 a.m. GO AWAY.

    The approval came despite a flood of opposition from astronomers, wildlife experts and others who say the light from the mirrors could distract airplane pilots, wreak havoc on astronomical observations and interfere with circadian rhythms, the light-and-dark cycles that help people, animals and plants know when to wake and sleep, to bloom or to migrate.

    Yeah no shit. Leave our circadian rhythms alone.

    In a letter to the F.C.C. sent last month, the American Astronomical Society, said the endeavor “cannot be considered to serve the public interest” and in fact would waste taxpayer dollars by wrecking the work of federally funded astronomical facilities, even as it brought untold risks to people and wildlife.

    “It is clear that the activities that Reflect Orbital is proposing will have an impact on the Earth environment, including on human health, agriculture and wildlife, in addition to astronomy,” Roohi Dalal, the society’s director of public policy, wrote.

    Darkness is a human right.

  • Politicizing the institution

    Biting off one’s foot to spite one’s hairdo.

    Trump on Friday ordered the interior department to display signs in front of the Smithsonian National Museum of American History that accuse the institution of inaccuracy.

    That’s fetch’em or I don’t know Arkansas!

    The order escalates the Trump’s attacks against the Smithsonian, which he and his allies accuse of politicizing the institution by focusing too much on injustices in American history, instead of more triumphant moments such as the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

    Who decides how much is too much? Who decides how little is little enough?

    Trump wouldn’t really know, would he. He has no experience of being any kind of underdog, and he doesn’t have enough intelligence, let alone empathy, to figure out for himself that other people have experiences that are different from his. Where the rest of us see the fortunate and the unfortunate, he sees winners and losers.

    Yes, the Declaration of Independence is a stirring document, but it doesn’t erase or mollify other aspects of US history, in particular slavery and genocide. It’s not as if those items are tiny little pimples on a vast and healthy bum. If it’s “politicizing” to mention them it’s also politicizing to conceal them.

    The order directs interior secretary Doug Burgum to huddle with the National Park Service and assistant to the president for domestic policy Vince Haley to come up with some temporary signs to install along the National Parks Service-maintained sidewalks and walkways leading into the museum.

    The signs will read “These poopyheads are all wrong and the US is perfect and fabulous in every way!!!”

  • No, it’s a secret

    But…why doesn’t NHS Fife want to make it public?

    NHS Fife ordered to publish trans guidance

    If it has trans guidance why not publish it? Why does guidance have to be secret?

    The Information Commissioner in Scotland, David Hamilton, has told NHS Fife to make its 2024 Trans Policy available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act. NHS Fife has thus far refused to release the document, citing a number of exemptions, all of which have been rejected by the Commissioner.

    Why? Why resist, why refuse? If it has a good policy, why not publish it? Presumably they think it is a good policy, so why are they swathing it in secrecy?

    Could it be because they know it’s incompatible with some rights of women?

  • Literally chop the bones out

    But this is a very healthy, beneficent, progressive, lovely, not at all sick ideology.

  • This way to the gas ladies

    It’s incitement. Never mind “offensive”; the issue is that it’s inciting genocide.

    Geddit? Women who don’t comply should be gassed.