Drat.
Firstly, the judgment gives permission for organisations like Stonewall to procure the withdrawal of employment from people whose protected characteristics they disagree with, if this can be framed as a “protest”. This seems to go directly against the terms of the Equality Act.…
— Allison Bailey (@BluskyeAllison) July 24, 2024
Thirdly, the judgment relies on the concept of “fair or reasonable or just”. This is surprising because the judge heard no submissions on this from either party in the 2-day Appeal, and it didn’t feature at all in the 117-page employment appeal judgment or the 23-day employment…
— Allison Bailey (@BluskyeAllison) July 24, 2024
… Read the restFifthly, my case is about direct discrimination, but the judgment also considers indirect discrimination. There,