Fragile bones

Dec 13th, 2020 5:52 pm | By

There’s the bone density issue.

That seems very undesirable indeed.



Is McEnany on the list?

Dec 13th, 2020 5:21 pm | By

This is rather galling:

White House staffers to receive Covid-19 vaccine ahead of general public

The people who have been busily spreading the virus as widely as they can are going to get the vaccine before we do, we who have been following the pandemic rules for the past nine months.

High-ranking White House officials are set to receive some of the first coronavirus vaccines in the United States, according to a White House official and a person familiar.

Those vaccinations, which could begin as soon as this week, would come while the vaccine is in extremely limited supply and only generally available to high-risk health care workers.

The President and other White House staff have regularly flouted US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for safety during the pandemic such as the wearing of face masks and social distancing.

There have been several Christmas parties held at the White House recently where those guidelines weren’t followed, and Trump held many events during the campaign where large crowds gathered, maskless.

But they get the first round of vaccinations anyway. Very let them eat cake.



Some guy

Dec 13th, 2020 1:21 pm | By

Northwestern University wipes its hands of Joseph Epstein.

Joseph Epstein has not been a lecturer at Northwestern since 2003.

While we firmly support academic freedom and freedom of expression, we do not agree with Mr. Epstein’s opinion and believe the designation of doctor is well deserved by anyone who has earned a Ph.D., an Ed.D. or an M.D.  

Northwestern is firmly committed to equity, diversity and inclusion, and strongly disagrees with Mr. Epstein’s misogynistic views.

Freedom of expression is a value, but there’s also such a thing as editorial discretion. Editors at the WSJ should have rejected that one, or at least required a searching re-write. (Then again maybe a polite argument that Dr. Jill Biden should not use her credential would have been more insidious because not so childish and venomous.)

The English department delivers The Cut Direct.

The Department is aware that a former adjunct lecturer who has not taught here in nearly 20 years has published an opinion piece that casts unmerited aspersion on Dr. Jill Biden’s rightful public claiming of her doctoral credentials and expertise. The Department rejects this opinion as well as the diminishment of anyone’s duly-earned degrees in any field, from any university.

You’d think the English department could come up with the word “diminution,” but whatever.



Beyond so sick of it

Dec 13th, 2020 1:02 pm | By

I daresay non-Doctor Joseph Epstein is happy, because even the BBC is reporting on his rude sexist pugnacious attack on Dr. Jill Biden. Global notoriety!

Joseph Epstein called Jill Biden “kiddo”, comparing her doctorate in education to an honorary degree.

“‘Dr Jill Biden’ sounds and feels fraudulent, not to say a touch comic,” he wrote in the Wall Street Journal.

But social media users argued that the article reflected sexist attitudes faced by many women in academia.

Well, yes – calling her “Jill” and then “kiddo” for example.

Let’s be clear about this – it was obviously very deliberate. He knew it would cause outrage, and that must be why he did it, because why the hell else would he do it? He doesn’t write a humorous etiquette column in the style of Miss Manners, and he didn’t have to word his column so insultingly, so he was going for the outcry. Attention!

Or maybe he’s a secret agent, teaching us lessons about the patriarchy from deep under cover.

But seriously, he wanted the outrage and we’re giving him the outrage so we’re giving him what he wants so maybe we should just ignore him. Maybe, yes, but I refuse, because I am so sick of people with more social clout throwing buckets of shit over people with less. Jill Biden herself has plenty of social clout now, of course, but women in general don’t, women as such don’t, and that’s the point here. Epstein is sneering at all women who have the gall to get a credential or honor or top job. He’s telling us all we’re just little girls called by our first names, just “kiddo,” and to stop thinking we get to hang out with the adults.

Doug Emhoff, the husband of Vice-President-elect Kamala Harris responded: “Dr Biden earned her degrees through hard work and pure grit. She is an inspiration to me, to her students, and to Americans across this country. This story would never have been written about a man.”

“I am so sick of the way accomplished, educated, successful women like @DrBiden are talked about in the media by misogynistic men. BEYOND SO SICK OF IT,” wrote Meghan McCain, daughter of late senator John McCain.

Some pointed out that many women and members of minority groups often choose to use their titles “to insist people… not overlook their real credentials”.

Northwestern University, where the author of the article taught until 2002, said it “strongly disagrees with Mr. Epstein’s misogynistic views”.

Figures in other administrations have used the non-medical title of doctor: they include Henry Kissinger, who served as secretary of state under presidents Nixon and Ford, and Sebastian Gorka, a former aide to President Donald Trump.

This is not the first time the issue of women using their academic titles has caused controversy online. In 2018, UK historian Fern Riddell started the hashtag #ImmodestWomen after receiving a backlash for referring to herself as Dr.

Punchline: the BBC style guide “uses the title Dr to refer to doctors of medicine, scientific doctors and church ministers who hold doctorates, when relevant.” So it won’t be calling Dr. Jill Biden Dr. Jill Biden.



They’re multiplying

Dec 13th, 2020 12:15 pm | By

A new nightmare looms.

Speculation about the post-White House career of Ivanka Trump is now centered on Florida, where the soon to be ex-first daughter and senior aide to her president father has reportedly bought an expensive plot of land for a house and may be considering a run for Senate.

She’s a twerp, she’s pig-ignorant, she defends everything her evil daddy does, she’s corrupt, and she’s a criminal. Also she’s entitled, arrogant, self-dealing, empty-headed, and narcissistic. Other than that, awesome choice for the Senate.

Ivanka Trump is not the only member of her family potentially eyeing up a political future post-Trump. Donald Trump Jr – who is popular with his father’s conservative base – is often seen as likely to make a serious bid to enter politics in his own right. Meanwhile, daughter-in-law Lara Trump has been mentioned as a potential candidate for the Senate in North Carolina.

Iiiiiiiiick. They’re like bedbugs.



So tiresome

Dec 13th, 2020 11:30 am | By

Just a few responses…



Invasion of the proudies

Dec 13th, 2020 10:49 am | By

It turns out the Proud Boys like violence. Who knew?

Thousands of maskless rallygoers who refuse to accept the results of the election turned downtown Washington into a falsehood-filled spectacle Saturday, two days before the electoral college will make the president’s loss official.

The Post sounds a bit fed-up. I don’t blame it.

In smaller numbers than their gathering last month, they roamed from the Capitol to the Mall and back again, seeking inspiration from speakers who railed against the Supreme Court, Fox News and President-elect Joe Biden. The crowds cheered for recently pardoned former national security adviser Michael Flynn, marched with conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and stood in awe of a flyover from what appeared to be Marine One.

In short, hooray for violence and lies, hooray for lies enforced by violence and for violence justified by lies, hooray hooray hooray.

Four people were stabbed near a Proud Boys hangout bar (it’s not clear whether it’s a regular hangout or just where they collected yesterday). The victims are in hospitals; it’s not known which team they were rooting for.

At first, officers in riot gear successfully kept the two sides apart, even as the groups splintered and roamed. In helmets and bulletproof vests, Proud Boys marched through downtown in militarylike rows, shouting “move out” and “1776!” They became increasingly angry as they wove through streets and alleys, only to find police continuously blocking their course with lines of bikes.

But the police couldn’t cover every inch of ground so fights broke out because hooray violence.

As the Proud Boys appeared at rallies earlier in the day Saturday, Trump cheered on all of the supporters who showed up to falsely claim that the election was stolen from him, tweeting “Wow! Thousands of people forming in Washington (D.C.) for Stop the Steal. Didn’t know about this, but I’ll be seeing them! #MAGA.”

The king of violence and lies himself.

The speakers painted a picture of a country in a battle between good and evil, in which God himself would ultimately ensure Trump remained in power. Sebastian Gorka, a former foreign policy adviser to Trump, said that when he heard the Supreme Court had dismissed an election case from Texas on Friday night, he told himself to “stop, take a deep breath, count to 10, read the Bible and pray.”

“We, thanks to our lord and savior, have already won,” Gorka claimed.

Sadly there’s a lot of truth to the good v evil picture, but they have the sides reversed. Not that I think the Democratic party stands for Pure Goodness, it’s just that I do think Trump stands for Nearly Pure Evil and drags his fans into that stance too.



Guest post: Any chance you might stop belittling women?

Dec 13th, 2020 9:22 am | By

Originally a comment by Papito on Kiddo.

As one whose book-learning is also piled higher and deeper, I only doctor when doctored at. I recall a work colleague introducing a visiting scientist as Dr. Fulano, and I said pleased to meet you Dr. Fulano, I’m Dr. Zutano. My colleague did a double-take before he recalled that my amazing skillz were acquired in the school of hard books.

I taught at a few universities, and I much preferred teaching at a state university over the more highly ranked university up the road. I found the students more engaged, more serious, more respectful, and more likely to actually use what I was teaching. Apparently the feeling was mutual, as the dean offered me a tenure-track position when it opened up, but I had already pivoted to a more exciting and remunerative career.

My mother also disliked being called Dr., because she wasn’t a medical doctor. But, like iknklast, it was the only way she could get any respect from some people. Did you know there are parts of this country, or people from them, who will insist on calling a fully-grown woman Miss Firstname? If being called Dr. Lastname bothered her, that was nothing compared to being called Miss Firstname. So Dr. Lastname it was. I made her a plaque in shop class that said Dr. Lastname, and it traveled to every desk thereafter.

It’s too bad there’s not a parallel to “Miss” for men, because nobody deserves to be Mirr Josephed more than this withered peduncle. Perhaps he needs to be called “Joey” more often. Like this:

Monsieur Columnist – Mr. Epstein – Joey – kiddo: a bit of advice on what may seem like a small matter to you, but which is important to others. Any chance you might stop belittling women? Making fun of women who actually did the work to get a doctorate, unlike yourself, sounds and feels very petty, not to say a touch jealous. Dr. Biden did original work, which she will build upon in her position as First Lady, on a matter of not just local but national importance. If this nation could in fact meet students needs, and thereby increase retention, at the community college level, this nation would benefit greatly – more than it has from anything you’ve done. We are fortunate to have a new First Lady whose project will be of national value, rather than something so vapid as the wife of the world’s foremost bully claiming to be against bullying, or another kept woman reciting stultifying anti-drug mantras. Think about it, Joey, and forthwith drop the act.

You taught at a national university for decades, without a doctorate. Congratulations: you got an academic job at a time when they went begging. Every new PhD graduate in the country already had a job, and they had to work down the list until they got to you. This is not a measure of how great you are, but of how easy your life has been, in comparison to those of later generations. Has it been as fun to judge soldiers of younger generations who actually had to fight, from your experience as a barracks polisher, as it has been to scoff at those who earn PhDs but can’t get the academic jobs that unqualified elders such as yourself sat on for decades?

Many are aware that getting a doctorate has been and, for many, still is, an arduous proceeding. I assure you that if you had to sit through my oral examination you would require that glass of water. Mine was in three foreign languages simultaneously, and I was expected to answer questions in the language in which they were asked. Like many newly-minted doctorates, I had to interview with people whose would never hire me because their abilities and publications looked small in comparison. People like you, Joey. I notice that you received your job without any publications, without any linguistic abilities, without any original research. Your first publication was fifteen years after you got a BA. Do you know that nobody from a younger generation would be hired with your credentials? And now you criticize others for not passing a trial you never even considered. Isn’t that a sort of academic stolen valor?

You go on, in your intolerant boasting, to ridicule honorary doctorates because, horror of horror, they are not only given to white people. Isn’t anything left just to us, you wail. Well, the truth is, Joey, that not only are many women more qualified, and more serious than you are, but many black people have contributed more generously than you have to American society and culture. You bemoan the coarsening and cheapening of academic credentials, without having any of your own, and it seems more and more like you are just crying about people you consider inherently lesser than yourself passing you by. We are living through a period with no great American writers, you say? Perhaps you should read more broadly, and consider that people who aren’t old white men like yourself may be producing the great literature of our era, it’s just that you won’t read it. Our literature lacks “gravity,” you say, but perhaps you mistake inertia for gravity. Does Yaa Gyasi lack gravity? Junot Díaz? Marilynne Robinson? They all have gravity to spare, even if it’s the gravity of realities you want to ignore. As does Dr. Biden. Isn’t your real problem that they’re not talking about you? Joey? Kid?



Home addresses

Dec 12th, 2020 5:42 pm | By

From the Daily Beast:

Federal law enforcement authorities say they are aware of a website that sprang up over the weekend and began doxxing federal and state government officials at odds with Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the election.

That is, government officials doing their jobs as opposed to helping Trump trash everything.

The site, which appears to have been created on Sunday, contains the home addresses, pictures of homes, personal emails, and photos of state and local officials who have pushed back on or questioned the president’s legal campaign.

The FBI confirmed it knows about it but wouldn’t say anything more.

Among the officials targeted—literally—by the enemiesofthepeople website were Govs. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI), Brian Kemp (R-GA), Doug Ducey (R-AZ), multiple people affiliated with the company Dominion Voting Systems, and Christopher Krebs, the former top federal cybersecurity official who was fired last month for publicly debunking many of the conspiracy theories floated by Trump and his legal team.

“If blood is spilled, it is on the hands of the president,” Krebs’ attorneys wrote in a Wednesday statement regarding the website. The specific threats, they noted, “may be domestic or foreign actors trying to stoke the violence.”

This is why we can’t have nice things.



Kiddo

Dec 12th, 2020 4:41 pm | By

What was that we were just saying about men patronizing women? That Diana (formerly David) Thomas thinks it’s nbd as long as women get their own way?

He wouldn’t know, of course. He wouldn’t know how corrosive the effect is, because he still knows it doesn’t apply to him, even if he doesn’t fully realize he knows it.

Anyway, men patronizing women.

He obviously did it on purpose, with malice aforethought. It’s obviously calculatedly insulting, since he can’t possibly think she wants to be called either “Jill” or “kiddo” by a conceited condescending shit like him.

There was a time when I made an effort to find Joseph Epstein interesting. I found some of the same things irritating as he did (if you follow me), so I kept trying to read him, but I found him just not a good writer. Not a bad one in the sense of mistake-ridden or illiterate or anything, but just lifeless, and self-important and self-admiring with it. You can see it just in that short passage – “what may seem like a small but I think is a not unimportant” oh fuck off. And then “Your degree is, I believe” – if you’re not sure then look it up. If you are sure then don’t pretend you’re not. It was that kind of thing – pompous filler instead of getting to the point. Kind of like “Steersman,” if anyone remembers that Top Bore from way back then.

So he’s a crap writer, and he made a cold decision to express his contempt for the woman who is married to the president-elect who managed to defeat that sack of garbage Donald Trump – and to top it all off he pretends it’s “unpromising” for academics in education to research student retention at community colleges. That’s nice; that’s generous. Community colleges are a path to a better life for millions of people not born with a ticket to the Ivy League. Community college can be a step to getting a four-year degree and even scholarships, and they cost a tiny fraction of what the for-profit “universities” charge the students they defraud.

So…what’s his point? I guess that women should just be called Mrs. Mansname and leave it at that?



Ooh cheeky

Dec 12th, 2020 12:53 pm | By

Clair Woodward on “competitive womaning”:

Diana Thomas is writing in the Telegraph about her week. Whizzing from hairdressers to lunch with a friend, to a plastic surgeon to a doctor. It’s a whirl!

Diana, of course, is a trans woman.

This week, after a chat with the hairdresser, it’s that lunch with a girlfriend. “Conscious of the drive home, I only drink one small glass of rosé, but consume a delicious dish of hake in a stew of tomatoes and mussels, mopped up with freshly baked bread and followed by a gooey chocolate pudding with hazelnut ice cream. Amanda sticks to a strict bread and gin diet, which could become all the rage.”

That’s how women think and talk, innit. “Gooey” pudding – isn’t she adorable? Mind you, she’s 62, and most women stop being cutesie long before that age; I think we have a gut instinct that it ceases to be cute around age 20, or even that being cute is maybe not such a great idea over the long haul. But men who “transition” to being women after decades of being that other sex seem to see things differently.

However, later in the week , Diana’s treating herself. “I’m due to return to London for a consultation with my vocal cord surgeon, followed by a visit to the V&A. A cup of coffee and a cheeky slice of cake in the museum café are not out of the question.”

A what? What the fuck is a cheeky slice of cake? Does it go wink wink nudge nudge as you eat it?

No, it’s more cutesy-talk from a man playacting woman.

Diana’s got years of frock action to look forward to, as she wrote previously.

“I’ve got 40 years of fashion and shopping to catch up on. Plus, I love clothes. I believe that fashion is as powerful a force for self-expression as any other art form…I long to have fun, go places, wear pretty clothes, rock bikinis and fall in love. And if all I can do for now is collect the clothes in which I will one day perform my personal romcom, so be it…”

No actual 62-year-old woman talks about how she longs to rock bikinis. Probably not too many 62-year-old men talk about how they long to rock Speedos, either, but they wouldn’t be as roughly treated for it.

Diana, of course, is quite rightly concerned about looking as good as possible, and sounding it, too, as she consults specialists about changing her voice to a lighter timbre. Saying the right things, as well, as in a discussion with a male estate agent who wouldn’t listen to what she was suggesting. “I’m beginning to find that men simply talk over me and ignore what I have to say, until they decide that in fact it was their idea all along. And yes, all together now… ‘Welcome to being a woman!’.” She concludes: “So then I asked myself, does it matter if they think it’s their idea, so long as I actually get my way?”

Oh good. Feminism being rethought and then thrown away by a man who at age 62 “identifies as” a woman. Thanks, Diana, we’ve been longing for the help.

Diana was born David Thomas, the son of a diplomat, and attended Eton and Cambridge before having a hugely successful journalism career; was married and had three children. Looks like a great life to me, obviously apart from the painful issue of being born into the wrong body, and in an interview with Mick Brown, admitted that she realised she had tremendous privilege, and knew she would have to give it up.

But not all of it. There’s the column in the Telegraph for instance, saying what it’s like being a woman from the point of view of a man.



Maybe a war would fix things

Dec 12th, 2020 11:49 am | By

Trump says he is declassifying all the things, and Boris Johnson appears to be hoping for a war with France.

Senior Conservatives have criticised Boris Johnson’s handling of the Brexit trade negotiations and his threat to deploy Royal Navy gunboats to patrol UK fishing waters in the event of no deal.

With the Sunday deadline for reaching an agreement fast approaching, the Ministry of Defence confirmed four 80-metre armed vessels had been placed on standby to guard British waters from EU trawlers from 1 January, in the absence of an agreement on fishing rights.

Tobias Ellwood, the Conservative chair of the Commons defence committee, called the threat of deploying gunboats “irresponsible”, when attention should be focused on striking a deal, while the former EU commissioner Chris Patten accused the prime minister of behaving like an “English nationalist”.

..

Patten, also speaking to [BBC Radio 4’s] Today, accused Johnson of being on a “runaway train of English exceptionalism”. The former Conservative party chairman added: “I hope that I’m wrong to feel so depressed about the outlook but I don’t think that Mr Johnson is a Conservative, I think he is an English nationalist.

“And all the things that Conservatives used to believe in – like standing up for the union, like not attacking our institutions, like the judges, like believing in international cooperation – seem to have gone out of the window.”

We know the feeling. Boy do we know the feeling.



Obstacles

Dec 12th, 2020 11:23 am | By

Again – closing polling places in counties where there are too many of those people.

Four of the 10 most populous counties in Georgia are reducing the number of locations where people can vote early in the state’s Senate runoff races, prompting outcry from civil rights and voting rights organizations.

And who lives in those counties? Shhhhh – it doesn’t do to say it out loud.

In Cobb County, the state’s third most populous county with more than 760,000 residents, election officials have announced five early voting locations, fewer than half of the 11 used for early voting ahead of last month’s general election.

Advocates warned that the reduction of early voting sites will particularly harm Black and Latino voters in the state by making it harder to access the polls.

Why, yes; that’s the goal.

“It’s deeply concerning,” Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms said on MSNBC when asked about the reductions reported by NBC News. “Clearly there is an attempt to make it even more difficult in the state of Georgia to vote.”

The more difficult it is, the less likely Democrats are to win.



How is this not a scandal?

Dec 12th, 2020 10:50 am | By

The revelation in this Tavistock study – that “blockers” and hormone-switches don’t fix the psychological misery – is shocking and scandalous.

Alleviating psychological symptoms is the basis for the treatment and the PR for it and the marketing angle for it and the political justification of it. It’s the tool the pro-trans fanatics grab to beat skeptics over the head with. It’s the whole thing.

It’s up there with the Tuskegee experiment or thalidomide.



Any adults nearby?

Dec 12th, 2020 6:12 am | By

This seems as if it could go wrong.



The fox and the windmill

Dec 12th, 2020 5:07 am | By

The misogynist barrister again.

Wealthy white middle-class “cis” he says – but most are far from wealthy, and plenty are not white and not middle-class. Jolyon on the other hand…

Image


All but one

Dec 12th, 2020 4:25 am | By

Is the edifice starting to topple?

The BBC reports on a study the Tavistock clinic just published:

All but one child treated for gender dysphoria with puberty-blocking drugs at a leading NHS clinic also received cross-sex hormones, a study has shown.

The Tavistock and Portman Trust has argued the treatments are not linked.

The study began in 2011 and enrolled 44 children aged between 12 and 15 over the following three years. At the time, only those aged 16 and over were eligible for puberty blockers in the UK.

When BBC Newsnight covered the study and its preliminary findings last year it highlighted how previous research suggested all young people who took blockers went on to take cross-sex hormones – the next stage towards transitioning to the opposite gender.

The Tavistock’s newly published findings appear to confirm this, with 43 out of 44 participants – or 98% – choosing to start treatment with cross-sex hormones.

The cheer-up myth is that blockers are just a pause, a breathing space, time to think – but if almost all the kids who take them go on to cross-sex hormones then that myth is a lie.

Earlier this month, the High Court ruled that children under-16 were unlikely to be able to give informed consent to treatment with puberty blockers.

The relationship between blockers and subsequent treatment with cross-sex hormones was a core feature of the case.

Lawyers representing the claimants said there was “a very high likelihood” children who start taking hormone blockers will later begin taking cross-sex hormones, leading potentially to infertility and impaired sexual function.

The Tavistock argued puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones were entirely separate stages of treatment and one does not automatically lead to the other.

And that turns out to be bullshit.

And this isn’t minor bullshit – this isn’t “oh well, no harm done” bullshit. This is tampering with the physical (and hence psychological) development of teenagers in a very drastic way. We’re being subject to an avalanche of propaganda to the effect that it’s fine, it’s awesome, it’s The Authentic Self – but the propagandists don’t know any of that, it’s just something they say.

The published study showed that treatment with the blocker brought about no change in psychological function.

This differs from Dutch findings “which reported improved psychological function,” upon which many gender clinics have based their treatment.

Ah. Interesting. The experimentees are no happier, and their bodies are messed up. Win win?



Guest post: Cheap, Dishonest, and Incompetent

Dec 11th, 2020 5:49 pm | By

Originally a comment by Screechy Monkey on SCOTUS to Trump: No.

OMG, I just came across the Most Trump Thing, Ever.

Remember that story a while ago about how Trump’s attorneys mistakenly filed a case in the Court of Federal Claims, instead of the District Court for the Western District of Michigan? The next day, they filed in Michigan, and the Federal Claims court dismissed the action there.

Well, apparently, Trump’s lawyers sent a letter to the Clerk of the Federal Claims court requesting a refund of their $400 filing fee, on the grounds that the federal courts’ electronic filing system had screwed up and caused the error.

Yes, the campaign that has raised many millions of dollars and wasted many hours of lawyer time on stupid court cases was demanding a $400 refund. So check off CHEAP on your bingo cards.

Well, the clerk referred the request to the judge, who issued an order denying the request. As the judge pointed out, the campaign’s claim of a screw-up by the court’s computers was nonsense, and this was clearly a screw-up by the attorney or his or her staff:

For whatever reason (and no good one is apparent to the Court), Plaintiffs have chosen not to be candid about what led them to file their complaint initially in this Court. But so far as the Court can tell, there was no “electronic error” involved. Rather, it was human error.

Plaintiffs’ counsel or a member of his staff mistakenly filed the complaint with this court rather than with the Western District of Michigan.

So that’s the DISHONEST space taken care of.

The judge goes on to note that actually, it is possible to seek a refund of filing fees paid inadvertently due to human error on the part of the filer, so the campaign might have gotten their $400 back if they’d simply come clean about it, but now that they’ve lied, forget it. So there’s INCOMPETENT.

In other words, the Trump legal team, having made a mistake (and I’m just going to give them a pass on the initial screw-up — these things happen), then lied about what happened in an attempt to get a lousy $400 back, and ended up with a federal judge calling them dishonest and giving them nothing. (In nice, federal-judge-speak.)

That is just a magnificent little illustration of the man himself. Cheap, Dishonest, and Incompetent.

Happy Biden Wins Again Day, everyone!



In the national interest

Dec 11th, 2020 4:58 pm | By

Now here’s something I didn’t know – that Trump tried to say it was the country who was slandering a woman he assaulted, not Trump the person bro. He tried to make all of us responsible for his lies and obstruction.

Lame-duck President Donald Trump has used “every stall tactic in the book” in a “desperate” attempt to avoid famed columnist E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuit accusing him of defaming her by denying that he raped her, Carroll’s attorneys told a judge on Friday morning.

The remarks were made at a hearing that Trump lodged an eleventh-hour objection to avoid. At 7:57 p.m. on Thursday night, Trump’s counsel filed a letter to stay all proceedings while they appeal of a ruling preventing the Department of Justice from acting as his private law firm on the taxpayer dime.

Shortly before the presidential election, Judge Kaplan rejected an attempt to rebrand Carroll v. Trump as Carroll v. United States of America. That attempt to substitute Trump with the nation relied upon the premise that the president acted in a official capacity when he said of Carroll: “She’s not my type.”

The Justice Department argued that Trump made his comment in service of his duties as President of the United States, an argument Carroll’s attorneys characterized as wrong and obscene.

“There is not a single person in the United States — not the president and not anyone else — whose job description includes slandering women they sexually assaulted,” attorney Roberta Kaplan wrote in October. “That should not be a controversial proposition. Remarkably, however, the Justice Department seeks to prove it wrong.”

Kind of breathtaking.



SCOTUS to Trump: No

Dec 11th, 2020 4:06 pm | By

First, the attempt:

President Donald Trump and 17 U.S. states on Wednesday threw their support behind a long-shot lawsuit by Texas seeking to overturn his election loss by asking the U.S. Supreme Court to throw out the voting results in four states.

Dear Supreme Court: please throw out the votes in four states, love Don.

Trump, defeated by President-elect Joe Biden in the Nov. 3 election, filed a motion with the court asking the nine justices to let him intervene and become a plaintiff in the suit filed on Tuesday by Republican-governed Texas against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

In a separate brief, lawyers for 17 states led by Missouri’s Republican Attorney General Eric Schmitt also urged the justices to hear the case.

Then, the failure:

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that sought to invalidate 10 million votes in four battleground states — Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin — that President Trump lost.

“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot,” the Supreme Court wrote.

That’s judicialese for “this is a crock of shit, go away and stop being such a baby.”