Paper trail

Oct 4th, 2019 7:54 am | By

I’m scrolling through CNN’s live updates on the Trump outrages, remembering to breathe every couple of minutes or so.

Headline from an hour and 20 minutes ago:

Trump told China’s president the US would stay silent on Hong Kong protests during trade talks

Breathing halted again.

Text under headline:

During a private phone call in June, President Trump promised Chinese President Xi Jinping that the US would remain quiet on pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong while trade talks continued, two sources familiar with knowledge of the call tell CNN.

Why this matters: The remarkable pledge to the Chinese leader is a dramatic departure from decades of US support for human rights in China and shows just how eager Trump is to strike a deal with Beijing as the trade war weighs on the US economy.

More to the point, it shows just how indifferent Trump is to human rights and human beings.

And like other calls with the leaders of Ukraine, Russia and Saudi Arabia, records of Trump’s call with Xi were moved to a highly-classified, codeword-protected system, greatly limiting the number of administration officials who were aware of the conversation.

Because it’s so filthy. They’ve been hiding the highly-filthy ones so that even most of the trumpies won’t know about them.

Scrolling down…last night there were text messages released.

The text messages, which were released by the House Intelligence Committee, underscore how Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, was closely connected to US policy on Ukraine and was involved in setting up the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky, in which Trump also urged an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

They show how cognizant the Ukrainians were about the importance of the election investigation to Trump and Giuliani’s role.

On the morning of the call, in an exchange with a key adviser to the Ukrainian President, then-US Special Envoy for Ukraine Kurt Volker made clear that it was important to the White House that Zelensky convince Trump that an investigation into the 2016 election would happen.

“Heard from the White House — assuming President Z convinces trump he will investigate/’get to the bottom of what happened’ in 2016, we will nail down date for visit to Washington,” Volker said via text to the Ukrainian adviser on the morning of July 25.

Volker provided Congress with the text messages ahead of his closed-door congressional testimony on Thursday before three committees leading the House’s impeachment inquiry into Trump and Ukraine.

So there it is, in writing.



Another consignment of mud

Oct 3rd, 2019 5:04 pm | By

And another “They did WHAT?” appears. Judd Legum:

“Two of President Trump’s top envoys to Ukraine drafted a statement for the country’s new president in August that would have committed Ukraine to pursuing investigations sought by Mr. Trump into his political rivals”

“Here, President Zelwhateveritis, here’s a statement where you promise to investigate Donald Trump’s rivals. Sign here please. Now please. We’re not discussing the javelins until you sign.”

The Times:

The statement would have committed Ukraine to investigating the energy company Burisma, which had employed Hunter Biden, the younger son of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. And it would have called for the Ukrainian government to look into what Mr. Trump and his allies believe was interference by Ukrainians in the 2016 election in the United States to benefit Hillary Clinton.

The idea behind the statement was to break the Ukrainians of their habit of promising American diplomats and leaders behind closed doors that they would look into matters and never follow through.

It is unclear if the statement was delivered to Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, but no statement was released publicly under his name. Around that time, the Ukrainian officials indicated to the Americans that they wanted to avoid becoming more deeply enmeshed in American politics.

It’s illegal six ways from Sunday, and it is no way to treat a friendly nation that is under pressure from Putin’s Russia.



Trump told Xi he would keep shtum about Hong Kong

Oct 3rd, 2019 4:47 pm | By

Trump is generous though. He doesn’t share his views on Biden with Ukraine only – no indeed! China gets to hear his opinions on the subject too.

When Donald Trump suggested today, at a press conference, that China should investigate Joe Biden he said he’d never actually pushed Chinese leader Xi Jinping to investigate his political rivals.

Now CNN reports that Trump discussed Biden and Elizabeth Warren with Xi during a whole call. He also reportedly told Xi he’d keep quiet about the protests in Hong Kong, so long as trade talks between China and the US progressed:

During a phone call with Xi on June 18, Trump raised Biden’s political prospects as well as those of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who by then had started rising in the polls, according to two people familiar with the discussion. In that call, Trump also told Xi he would remain quiet on Hong Kong protests as trade talks progressed.

The White House record of that call was later stored in the highly secured electronic system used to house a now-infamous phone call with Ukraine’s President and which helped spark a whistleblower complaint that’s led Democrats to open an impeachment inquiry into Trump. On Thursday, Trump told reporters at the White House he’d consider asking his counterpart in Beijing to investigate the Bidens, adding to a growing list of foreign leaders he’s tried to enlist in his attempts to bring down a potential Democratic challenger.

Though it’s unclear whether Trump actually asked Xi to investigate his rivals, it seems he was willing to trade favors — and look the other way while China violently quashes protests in Hong Kong, so long as Xi continued to negotiate on trade.

And by golly he has looked the other way.

Even amidst mounting violence in Hong Kong this week, Trump offered only a message of congratulations to Xi, tweeting: “Congratulations to President Xi and the Chinese people on the 70th Anniversary of the People’s Republic of China!”

Earlier today senator Warren published an op-ed in Foreign Policy, urging Washington to stand up for the protesters.

Washington is too busy stand up for the Trumpers.



The woman, bad news

Oct 3rd, 2019 4:31 pm | By

Another item for the list:

President Donald Trump ordered the removal of Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch from her post in Ukraine following complaints by his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and others, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

Trump’s personal lawyer gets to decide who is ambassador to Ukraine. Interesting.

Yovanovitch, who was recalled months earlier than expected in May 2019, was accused by Giuliani without evidence of trying to undermine the President and blocking efforts to investigate Democrats like former Vice President Joe Biden. According to the Wall Street Journal, a person familiar with the matter said that State Department officials were told that her removal was “a priority” for Trump.

Because Trump doesn’t think about “is she a good diplomat” or “is she well qualified” or “are US interests in safe hands with her.” All he thinks about is whether she’s doing what he wants for his reasons.

Asked on Thursday morning why Yovanovitch was recalled, Trump said, “I don’t know if I recalled her or somebody recalled her, but I heard very, very bad things about her for a very long period of time — not good.”

No he didn’t; he just made that up. He casually trashed her professional reputation because Giuliani told him she wasn’t anti-Biden  enough or some such shit.

The US President had also disparaged the former ambassador to Ukraine in his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that,” Trump said, according to a White House transcript.

Even though not a word of it is true.

Yovanovitch, a career member of the foreign service and who has served in ambassadorships under three presidents, was sworn in as ambassador to Ukraine in August 2016. Former officials who worked with her praised her experience and ability and the diplomatic community has rallied to support her.

Hillary Clinton did so on Maddow yesterday.



Weird foreplay

Oct 3rd, 2019 12:22 pm | By

That didn’t go well.

Legendary journalist Bob Woodward is coming under heavy fire for the questions he asked while interviewing the Pulitzer-winning investigative team of Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey at a Washington, DC, event on Wednesday night. After Woodward repeatedly interrupted Kantor and Twohey and posited that Harvey Weinstein’s behavior could have been “weird foreplay,” audience members booed Woodward, and some attendees even walked out of the event.

Kantor and Twohey are the Times reporters who broke the Harvey Weinstein story. They chose Woodward to interview them.

Some audience members began to yell back at Woodward as he repeatedly interrupted Kantor and Twohey, saying, “Let them finish!” and “Every woman deserves to be heard!”

And as the conversation veered away from investigative journalism and into sexual misconduct, Woodward’s questions apparently became less and less well-informed.

The most detailed account of what happened comes from Robyn Swirling, the founder of the anti-sexual-harassment organization Works in Progress, who wrote a long tweet thread describing Woodward’s questions. Swirling says that Woodward spent more than 10 minutes asking Kantor and Twohey why Weinstein harassed and assaulted women the way that he allegedly did. She also says that when Kantor and Twohey repeated that Weinstein’s actions were an abuse of power, enabled by a system that allowed him to silence women, Woodward accused them of dodging his question.

“So it’s about power? It’s about sex also, though, isn’t it?” Woodward reportedly said, asking whether Weinstein’s actions might have been “a weird foreplay.”

Ah yes, the old “rape as weird foreplay” kink. Don’t kinkshame the rapists!

“Work with sexual offenders has confirmed that the motivating factor for sexual violence is not sexual desire,” the World Health Organization states in its guidelines on sexual violence. “Although sexuality and aggression are involved in all forms of sexual violence, sex is merely the medium used to express various types of non-sexual feelings such as anger and hostility towards women, as well as a need to control, dominate and assert power over them.”

How could that not be the case? If you’re hungry you don’t go around assaulting people to get at their sandwiches. If you have a sunburn you don’t lock people in a room with you and force them to apply sunburn cream. If you’re bored you don’t pull a gun on people and tell them to entertain you. Yes, of course sexual violence is about power. That’s one major reason the whole “TERFs get trans women killed” trope is such utter bullshit: it turns the power differential inside-out.

And the question of what might have been going on in Weinstein’s head is missing from the pointedly titled She Said for a reason: Kantor and Twohey didn’t set out to analyze Weinstein’s motivations, but to focus on the effects of his actions on the women he is accused of abusing, and to prove through reporting that there was a whole system covering up Weinstein’s misdeeds and silencing the women he targeted.

The tension in the room was only exacerbated by Woodward’s repeated claims that Kantor and Twohey were dodging his question. “You could just feel the whole audience going into a defensive posture,” Amaria, the Vox visuals editor, said.

Woodward’s refusal to accept Twohey and Kantor’s answers to his questions — and his repeated attempts to talk over them as they tried to respond — was a refusal to accept their expertise as journalists, and a decision to prioritize his own understanding of sexual violence over theirs without any apparent education in the field.

Ironically, the conversation ended up replicating the very power dynamics that Twohey and Kantor were trying to explain, the power dynamics that let Weinstein get away with what he did for so long: a man exerting his own institutional power over the women in the room with him, just because he could.

And apparently not even realizing he was doing it. We’ve been pointing this shit out for fifty years now, and they still don’t get it. Woodward is dodging that question.



An expert in everything

Oct 3rd, 2019 11:40 am | By

More on Trump’s narcissism (it’s a long piece):

[F]rom the perspective of the public at large, the debate over whether Trump meets the clinical diagnostic criteria for NPD—or whether psychiatrists can and should answer that question without directly examining him—is beside the point. The goal of a diagnosis is to help a clinician guide treatment. The question facing the public is very different: Does the president of the United States exhibit a consistent pattern of behavior that suggests he is incapable of properly discharging the duties of his office?

Even Trump’s own allies recognize the degree of his narcissism. When he launched racist attacks on four congresswomen of color, Senator Lindsey Graham explained, “That’s just the way he is. It’s more narcissism than anything else.” So, too, do skeptics of assigning a clinical diagnosis. “No one is denying,” [psychiatrist Allen] Frances told Rolling Stone, “that he is as narcissistic an individual as one is ever likely to encounter.” The president’s exceptional narcissism is his defining characteristic—and understanding that is crucial to evaluating his fitness for office.

I think it’s more that it’s his defining characteristic in combination with another one – his complete lack of filter or inhibition. It’s as if his narcissism overwhelms every other capacity he might have. It seems to me quite possible that, say, Reagan and Clinton and Bush 2 all think or thought every bit as highly of themselves as Trump does, but that isn’t all there is to them. They have other interests and other motivations. Trump…what does Trump ever even think about other than himself? He pays attention to other people only in their relation to him: flatterer or enemy. His “policies” might as well be flashy jewelry or a red convertible: all they’re about is Look At Me.

So what does his narcissism tell him? That he’s brilliant, and best at everything.

Trump claims to be an expert—the world’s greatest—in anything and everything. As one video mash-up shows, Trump has at various times claimed—in all seriousness—that no one knows more than he does about: taxes, income, construction, campaign finance, drones, technology, infrastructure, work visas, the Islamic State, “things” generally, environmental-impact statements, Facebook, renewable energy, polls, courts, steelworkers, golf, banks, trade, nuclear weapons, tax law, lawsuits, currency devaluation, money, “the system,” debt, and politicians. Trump described his admission as a transfer student into Wharton’s undergraduate program as “super genius stuff,” even though he didn’t strike the admissions officer who approved his candidacy as a “genius,” let alone a “super genius”; Trump claimed to have “heard I was first in my class” at Wharton, despite the fact that his name didn’t appear on the dean’s list there, or in the commencement program’s list of graduates receiving honors.

Plus…we can tell. His stupidity is obvious, so obvious you can’t miss it.

Here’s a man who holds rallies with no elections in sight, so that he can bask in his supporters’ cheers; even when elections are near, and he’s supposed to be helping other candidates, he consistently keeps the focus on himself. He loves to watch replays of himself at the rallies, and “luxuriates in the moments he believes are evidence of his brilliance.” In July, after his controversial, publicly funded, campaign-style Independence Day celebration, Trump tweeted, “Our Country is the envy of the World. Thank you, Mr. President!” In February 2017, Trump was given a private tour of the newly opened National Museum of African American History and Culture, and paused in front of an exhibit on the Dutch role in the slave trade. He turned to the museum’s director and said, “You know, they love me in the Netherlands.”

“Enough about me, let’s talk about you: what do you think of me?”

Plus he gots no empathy.

One of the most striking aspects of Trump’s personality is his utter and complete lack of empathy. By empathy, psychologists and psychiatrists mean the ability to understand or relate to what someone else is experiencing—the capacity to envision someone else’s feelings, perceptions, and thoughts.

The notorious lawyer and fixer Roy Cohn, who once counseled Trump, said that “Donald pisses ice water,” and indeed, examples of Trump’s utter lack of normal human empathy abound. Trump himselfhas toldthe story of a charity ball—an “incredible ball”—he once held at Mar-a-Lago for the Red Cross. “So what happens is, this guy falls off right on his face, hits his head, and I thought he died … His wife is screaming—she’s sitting right next to him, and she’s screaming.” By his own account, Trump’s concern wasn’t the poor man’s well-being or his wife’s. It was the bloody mess on his expensive floor. “You know, beautiful marble floor, didn’t look like it. It changed color. Became very red … I said, ‘Oh, my God, that’s disgusting,’ and I turned away. I couldn’t, you know, he was right in front of me and I turned away.” Trump describes himself as saying, after the injured man was hauled away on a makeshift stretcher, “‘Get that blood cleaned up! It’s disgusting!’ The next day, I forgot to call [the man] to say is he okay … It’s just not my thing.”

And then there’s the pathological absence of a conscience.

A second disorder also frequently ascribed to Trump by professionals is sociopathy—what the DSM-5 calls antisocial personality disorder. As described by Lance Dodes, a former assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, “sociopathy is among the most severe mental disturbances.” Central to sociopathy is a complete lack of empathy—along with “an absence of guilt.” Sociopaths engage in “intentional manipulation, and controlling or even sadistically harming others for personal power or gratification. People with sociopathic traits have a flaw in the basic nature of human beings … They are lacking an essential part of being human.” For its part, the DSM-5 states that the “essential feature of antisocial personality disorder is a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood.”

Fits. Fits his attitude to migrants, fits the way he treats the other people in his administration, fits the way he talks about women, fits his complete refusal to grasp the concept “this thing I did was wrong.”

And there’s still a lot more in the piece. Plumbing the depths of Trump’s awfulness takes many words.



Behavior like this is unusual

Oct 3rd, 2019 10:22 am | By

George Conway takes an extended look at the question of Trump’s disordered behavior.

As Bob Woodward recounts at length in his book Fear, members of Trump’s criminal-defense team fought both Trump and Mueller tooth and nail to keep Trump from being interviewed by the Office of Special Counsel. A practice testimonial session ended with Trump spouting wild, baseless assertions in a rage. Woodward quotes Trump’s outside counsel John Dowd as saying that Trump “just made something up” in response to one question. “That’s his nature.” Woodward also recounts Dowd’s thinking when he argued to Trump that the president was “not really capable” of answering Mueller’s questions face to face. Dowd had “to dress it up as much as possible, to say, it’s not your fault … He could not say what he knew was true: ‘You’re a fucking liar.’ That was the problem.” (Dowd disputes this account.) Which raises the question: If Trump can’t tell the truth even when it counts most, with legal jeopardy on the line and lawyers there to help prepare him, is he able to apprehend the truth at all?

Behavior like this is unusual, a point that journalists across the political spectrum have made. “This is not normal,” Megan McArdle wrote in late August. “And I don’t mean that as in, ‘Trump is violating the shibboleths of the Washington establishment.’ I mean that as in, ‘This is not normal for a functioning adult.’” James Fallows observed, also in August, that Trump is having “episodes of what would be called outright lunacy, if they occurred in any other setting,” and that if he “were in virtually any other position of responsibility, action would already be under way to remove him from that role.”

But he’s in a position of maximum responsibility, so we can’t. Something not quite right there.



If we can keep it

Oct 3rd, 2019 9:57 am | By

Is he thinking (or more likely being told) that if he does it openly then it’s not a crime?

Historian Kevin Kruse:

This is apparently going to be the play — repeat the impeachable offense out in the open and pretend that it’s a totally normal thing to do.

Legal eagles on Twitter are pointing out that it’s still a crime. Hillary Clinton for one:

Someone should inform the president that impeachable offenses committed on national television still count.

Laurence Tribe for another:

Nixon: “ If the president does it, it’s not illegal.”

Trump: “If this stable genius does it in broad daylight, it couldn’t be impeachable.”

Q: How dumb does he think we are?

A: Dumb as rocks.

Adam Schiff:

The President cannot use the power of his office to pressure foreign leaders to investigate his political opponents.

His rant this morning reinforces the urgency of our work.

America is a Republic, if we can keep it.

That last line came up in the press conference with Pelosi and Schiff yesterday. Pelosi said it:

Since the Chairman mentioned our Founders, they put guardrails in the Constitution because they knew there might be someone who would overplay his or her power.  They never thought that we would have a President who would kick those guardrails over and disregard the Constitution and say, proposition, ‘Article II says that I can do whatever I feel like.’

So, this is sad.  We have to be prayerful.  We have to be worthy of the Constitution as we go forward.  We have to be fair to the President and that’s why this is an investigation: an inquiry, and not an outright impeachment, and we have to give the President his chance to exonerate himself.  But, he thinks what he did was perfect.  So, we have that situation, but I say to my colleagues, ‘Calmness, quiet so that we can hear, that we can hear what is being said in this regard.’

Again, on that very day, September 17th, that was Constitution Day, a Tuesday.  Two Tuesdays ago from yesterday.  That was when that explosion hit of what possibly happened in that phone conversation, which the President confirmed to me in our call.

Q:  Madam Speaker?

Speaker Pelosi.  And that day was the day we observed the adoption of our Constitution, September 17th.  On that day, way back when, when Benjamin Franklin left Independence Hall, people said to him ‘What do we have, Dr. Franklin, a monarchy or a Republic?’  He said ‘A Republic, if we can keep it.’

It is our responsibility to keep that Republic with the genius of the separation of powers, three co‑equal branches of government, each a check and balance on the others, separation of power, a Republic, if we can keep it.  That’s our responsibility, that’s the oath of office that we take, and that is what is the basis – one of the reasons why we just have to look at the facts and the Constitution.

Big, big if.



Descent continues

Oct 3rd, 2019 9:14 am | By
Descent continues

What’s new? Trump on the lawn telling reporters he did tell Ukraine to “investigate” Bidens.

Trump admits he asked Ukraine to dig up dirt on Biden, and asks China to do the same. Like Nixon telling America “I ordered the break in.”

The Guardian reports:

Donald Trump, speaking outside the White House, said Ukraine should investigate his rival Joe Biden – exactly the thing Trump is under threat of impeachment for – and added that China should also start a probe.

“If they were honest about it, they would start a major investigation into the Bidens,” Trump said when asked what he wanted Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky to do.

“I would say President Zelenskiy, if it was me, I would start an investigation into the Bidens.”

Trump said China should also start an investigation into the Bidens, and suggested he might ask the country to do so.

Asked if he had requested President Xi of China to help investigate the Bidens, POTUS replied: “I haven’t but it’s certainly something we can start thinking about.”

Well, except for the fact that it’s illegal. Very illegal. More illegal than sloppy parking.

Meanwhile Lindsey Graham is Helping.

Storm clouds are continuing to gather around Donald Trump over the Ukraine scandal, but that hasn’t stopped his faithful confidante, Lindsay Graham, from reportedly urging foreign governments to work with William Barr in investigating the origins of the Mueller inquiry.

Graham is said to have written to the prime ministers of Australia, Italy and the UK to request their “continued cooperation with attorney general Barr as the Department of Justice continues to investigate the origins and extent of foreign influence in the 2016 election”.

The investigation is an attempt to discredit Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.

One of Trump’s many retweets over the past few hours:

Capture

So adult.



It was perfect, perfect

Oct 2nd, 2019 2:07 pm | By

After the car crash sit down with President Niinistö there was a car crash press conference with President Niinistö.

It starts at about 1:15.

It’s a replay of the sitdown.

That’s one of the creepiest things about watching and listening to Trump – the repetition. The endless, endless, demented repetition. He has his talking points and he repeats them on Twitter and at sit downs and at press conferences and at press sprays and doubtless every couple of minutes everywhere else. The call was perfect, perfect. Lindsey Graham said “I never knew you were that nice.” It was perfect, perfect, not a thing wrong with it. He called Ukraine to get permission to share the transcript; he didn’t want to do it, he hated to do it. Shifty Schiff.

It’s perseveration, is what it is. He can’t even manage to remember that the people he’s saying these things to have heard them before and seen them in his tweets before. His tweets are repetitive.

The guy’s brain is broken.



↓STUDENTS↓

Oct 2nd, 2019 12:50 pm | By

State theocracy from the governor of Kentucky:

↓STUDENTS↓

#BringYourBible to School Day is THIS Thursday, Oct. 3!

The Judeo-Christian principles that are bound in this book are timeless, containing an amazing amount of history, knowledge, wisdom and guidance…

Bring it. Read it. Share it.

It’s attached to a video in which he says he wants to encourage every single student in Kentucky to do this bible thing. I didn’t watch the rest; I’ve had enough sick-making video for one day.

But about that tweet, and even apart from the church-state issue, and the other religions issue, and the what does that have to do with school anyway issue, there is also the content of what he says. Which “Judeo-Christian principles” are timeless? The pro-genocide ones? The pro-throwing a woman to dogs one? The pro-wars of religion ones? The pro-kill your kid if god tells you to one?

It is possible to find some ok moral advice in the bible if you really search, but so what? It’s easy to find better moral advice in other sources.

The bible is not a good source for history.

The bible is not a good source for knowledge or wisdom.

The bible is not a good source for guidance.

It has some ok stories, and some fine poetry (at least in the King James translation). It is useful for literary background, getting some idea of what believers believe, and the like, but what Governor Dopy says is just nonsense.

Plus that whole church-state issue, and the other religions issue, and the what does that have to do with school anyway issue.



Stable genius

Oct 2nd, 2019 12:02 pm | By

Doug Mills of the NY Times:

@realDonaldTrump responds to reporters question about Ukraine during a meeting in the Oval Office.

Image



25

Oct 2nd, 2019 11:26 am | By

Image



Teetering

Oct 2nd, 2019 10:56 am | By

Trump just did an Oval Office sit down with the president of Finland, which he used to have a terrifying public freakout.

Go to 45 minutes to watch him do it.

Is it true that “he couldn’t carry his jockstrap” is a saying? Trump says it is, and that it applies to Adam Schiff with respect to Mike Pompeo.



The needs of today’s audiences

Oct 2nd, 2019 10:36 am | By

The Independent thinks it’s marvelous.

The Old Vic theatre in London is the latest establishment to scrap single-sex toilets in favour of more inclusive alternatives.

As part of a major refurbishment, the 201-year-old theatre has replaced signs on male and female lavatories with pictures of cubicles or urinals.

The brand new facilities have been installed to allow “people to make their own decision about which loo is suitable for them,” the theatre has said.

Not in the case of women who don’t want to share the loo with men they haven’t.

Women don’t want to share a room with men at urinals, and given that whole thing about men placing tiny cameras in women’s toilets they’re not all that keen on sharing cubicle rooms with men either. Excluding women isn’t really all that “inclusive.”

The theatre has doubled its number of toilet cubicles, which were formerly women’s facilities, in the hope that this may address the industry-wide problem whereby queues for women’s toilets are far longer than those for men.

What? It’s doubled its number of toilet cubicles but at the same time it’s also opened all of them to men, so how likely is it that that will help much?

Speaking about the changes, Kate Varah, executive director at the Old Vic said: “We set out to make changes to The Old Vic that were reflective of the needs of today’s audiences and our local community.”

Suddenly today’s women have a “need” to pee next to men?



Welcome urinals into your life

Oct 2nd, 2019 10:05 am | By

Meanwhile, the Old Vic has completed some renovations.

Yesterday we officially opened our building after nine months of renovations to double the number of loos and improve accessibility.

When you come to visit us you might notice something a little different about our new loos. First, there are double the number – 44 loos within the building.

Our loos now offer ‘self-selection’ rather than being labelled male or female. This takes a descriptive, rather than prescriptive, approach following advice from surveys conducted with focus groups.

Uh oh…

When you arrive in the theatre, you will see labels signposting which blocks contain cubicles and which contain urinals. We also have one specifically designed gender neutral loo.

So men will be able to use all of them, while women are able to use only the ones with cubicles. This is a good plan because…???

You can choose which one you want to use, rather than responding to a label placed on you which you may not identify with.

You know…when I’m at a theater and needing to pee at intermission when there’s always a massive line/queue for the women’s I’m really not thinking about what label I “identify with”; I’m thinking about how unlikely it is that I’ll be able to get in the door before intermission is over.

But actually that’s true even when there isn’t a rush and it’s not now or never – it’s true pretty much always. Public toilets are not a big Identity Moment, they’re a utilitarian necessity that one wants to get into and out of as expeditiously as possible.

As Caroline Criado-Perez put it:

So @oldvictheatre has refurbished their toilets, and ended up giving men 18 facilities practically speaking just for them, plus 24 they share with women. So that’s 42 men have access to. Meanwhile women have access to 24, that they share with men. This is an improvement how?

And Tracy King:

Am I getting this right, they expect women to go into a room that has urinals where men have their nobs out to piss and just happily wander in to use the cubicles? That’s what Old Vic is asking? That women do that?

Here’s what will happen: women will not use the room where men are holding their penises. Instead, we will use the other room, except men can also use that room so there is literally nowhere free from men that we can be at our most vulnerable. Lawsuits.

In the meantime…well, I guess just avoid drinking anything for several hours before you go to see a play at the Old Vic.



Days of wrath

Oct 2nd, 2019 9:20 am | By
Days of wrath

He mad.

Capture

The Do Nothing Democrats should be focused on building up our Country, not wasting everyone’s time and energy on BULLSHIT, which is what they have been doing ever since I got overwhelmingly elected in 2016, 223-306. Get a better candidate this time, you’ll need it!

 



None of which I’ve seen [but I heard it all]

Oct 2nd, 2019 9:14 am | By

The Guardian Live on Pompeo’s belated admission that he was on that phone call:

Some more context on Secretary Pompeo’s admission that he took part in the July phone call between Donald Trump and Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky.

Pompeo’s involvement in the call (he listened in to the conversation and does not appear to have actively participated) was first reported by the Wall Street Journal last week. Pompeo’s admission, made earlier today on an official trip to the Vatican, confirms this reporting.

Although Pompeo has sought to downplay the relevance of his participation, describing it as part of normal state department business, that explanation only takes you so far.

Aside from the substance of the call, which involved Trump pushing Zelensky to commence a domestic investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden with the assistance of his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, Pompeo has also pleaded ignorance over the existence of the conversation in previous interviews.

Which in one way is like “No kidding, of course he lied and said he didn’t” – but that’s only in the “they have taught us to assume they are always lying” way. In the normal, basic, let’s everybody play fair way, there’s no “of course” about it. In other words it is both utterly unsurprising and profoundly horrifying that he lied to all of us about this. Everything they’re doing here is filthy, beyond the wildest dreams even of Nixon, and we have to keep being aware of that, even though it’s bad for our blood pressure. This is Trump and his gang helping Putin, regardless of US interests and global interests, and harming Ukraine and other countries threatened by Russia and all other liberal democracies, all for…what? Trump Tower Moscow? Blackmail? Love? We don’t know.

When reports of the whistleblower complaint first emerged in last month, Pompeo was asked by ABC News about his knowledge of the conversation between Trump and Zelensky. His response, which I will publish in full below, was particularly evasive, and implied he was not aware of the nature of the conversation, which we now know he was participating in.

ABC: And I want to turn to this whistleblower complaint, Mr. Secretary. The complaint involving the President and a phone call with a foreign leader to the director of national intelligence inspector general. That’s where the complaint was launched by the whistle-blower. The Wall Street Journal is reporting that President Trump pressed the president of Ukraine eight times to work with Rudy Giuliani to investigate Joe Biden’s son. What do you know about those conversations?

POMPEO: So, you just gave me a report about a I.C. whistle-blower complaint, none of which I’ve seen. I can tell you about this administration’s policies with Ukraine. I remember the previous administration was begged — begged by the Ukrainian people to deliver defensive arms, so that they could protect themselves from Vladimir Putin and Russia. And they gave them blankets. This administration took seriously the responsibility of the Ukrainian people. We’ve provided now on multiple occasions resources, so that the — the Ukrainians can defend themselves. We’ve worked on that. We — we’re working — we’ll see President Zelensky this week. We want a good relationship with the Ukrainian people.

 

Adam Schiff has just reminded us, in a joint press conference with Nancy Pelosi, that Congress voted $$ for Ukraine and Trump & gang secretly blocked that $$ and then used it as leverage in that “perfect” phone call. Pompeo of course knew that, so all that stuff up there is a pack of lies.



Castle with battlements & moot

Oct 2nd, 2019 8:20 am | By
Castle with battlements & moot

Aw yeah.

Capture

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 35m
Now the press is trying to sell the fact that I wanted a Moot stuffed with alligators and snakes, with an electrified fence and sharp spikes on top, at our Southern Border. I may be tough on Border Security, but not that tough. The press has gone Crazy. Fake News!

You watch: moots stuffed with alligators and snakes are going to be the next big thing.



There are no words

Oct 1st, 2019 5:27 pm | By

One more item before I run screaming into the night –

President Donald Trump suggested shooting migrants in the legs in order to slow them down after they crossed the southern border during a March meeting in which he called for a shut down of the entire US-Mexico border, The New York Times reported Tuesday.

Citing interviews with more than a dozen White House and administration officials directly involved, the Times — in an excerpt from the book “Border Wars: Inside Trump’s Assault on Immigration” — reported that Trump had moved on from the idea by the end of what the Times described as a “frenzied week of presidential rages.” But he had also pivoted to removing staff who had opposed him, an idea largely advocated by White House aide Stephen Miller in his push for greater influence on immigration policy.

Shooting. migrants. in the legs.