What level?

What level?

May 11, 2026

Wait.

She is correct – but there are human beings here that feel that they are a woman, and I’m not saying that they’re right or they’re wrong what I’m saying is when you introduce this level of hate into a debate

Wait.

What “level of hate”?

Where is the connection between knowing that a man is a man and “this level of hate”?

There isn’t a connection. What there is, is one of those cartoons where Bugs or WileE or whoever it is slams to a screeching halt at the edge of a cliff.

There is a huge and absolute gap between knowing that a man is a man and this or any level of hate.

Knowing what things are is not hate.

Can we get clear on that for a change?

There are plenty of true facts that it can be rude or cruel to state or insist on or make a big noise about.

But here’s the shocker: saying that men are men is not one of them.

Is telling a particular man (who claims to be a woman) that he’s a man one of them?

That’s a tough one.

But the issue is telling men who claim to be women in general that they’re men, rather than telling individual men that one at a time. It’s not rude or cruel or any kind of hate to refuse to repeat the lie that men are women if they say they are.

Comments

2 responses to “What level?”

Your Name’s not Bruce?

May 11, 2026 10:14 AM

I would suggest that a man insisting his a woman, and demanding access to female spaces, facilities, and opportunities on the basis of that insistence is introducing “a level of hate” into “a debate.” Certainly claiming that dressing, or performing, or feeling a certain way is all that is needed to “be” a woman, or female, is misogynistic behaviour.
Your Name’s not Bruce?

May 11, 2026 10:37 AM

“I would suggest that a man insisting he is a woman…”

Sigh.

Comments

2 responses to “What level?”